I see a lot of people saying this seems not a big deal, or that his leadership deserved promotion. It’s because this is a second order article. The original, most substantive source that I could find is quite thorough: https://archive.is/wqdkF > "He would ask us to do personal things for him," one of these people said. "He said, 'I need you to write a briefing for me on Russian history and politics.' [...] We had abs…
The complaints in the article sound ridiculous. He wrote "the F* word" in an email? He fired people? He sometimes got angry? Maybe he just is a human being. People seem to feel entitled to godlike father figures as bosses now, who pamper them all the way in their comfy 9 to 5 jobs? Not saying you should scream at your employees, but humans can get angry and in general are not perfect. If it is too much for you, quit.…
Or maybe they are so far removed from the actual events that you can not tell the seriousness of them from just a random news article?
Is it so hard to just trust the people who say his behaviour was awful?