Live data from Hacker News

After DeepMind’s cofounder was placed on leave for bullying, Google promoted him

morningbrew.com

71–80 of 349 posts

Re: After DeepMind’s cofounder was placed on leave for bullying, Google promoted him

#71

I see a lot of people saying this seems not a big deal, or that his leadership deserved promotion. It’s because this is a second order article. The original, most substantive source that I could find is quite thorough: https://archive.is/wqdkF > "He would ask us to do personal things for him," one of these people said. "He said, 'I need you to write a briefing for me on Russian history and politics.' [...] We had abs…

The complaints in the article sound ridiculous. He wrote "the F* word" in an email? He fired people? He sometimes got angry? Maybe he just is a human being. People seem to feel entitled to godlike father figures as bosses now, who pamper them all the way in their comfy 9 to 5 jobs? Not saying you should scream at your employees, but humans can get angry and in general are not perfect. If it is too much for you, quit.…

> The complaints in the article sound ridiculous

Or maybe they are so far removed from the actual events that you can not tell the seriousness of them from just a random news article?

Is it so hard to just trust the people who say his behaviour was awful?

Re: After DeepMind’s cofounder was placed on leave for bullying, Google promoted him

#72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The complaints in the article sound ridiculous. He wrote "the F* word" in an email? He fired people? He sometimes got angry? Maybe he just is a human being. People seem to feel entitled to godlike father figures as bosses now, who pamper them all the way in their comfy 9 to 5 jobs? Not saying you should scream at your employees, but humans can get angry and in general are not perfect. If it is too much for you, quit.…

Toxic work environments are just a breeding ground for lawsuits and expose anyways

Being excessively sensitive to carefully chosen four letter words used appropriately for emphasis is a form of toxicity.

Re: After DeepMind’s cofounder was placed on leave for bullying, Google promoted him

#73

I see a lot of people saying this seems not a big deal, or that his leadership deserved promotion. It’s because this is a second order article. The original, most substantive source that I could find is quite thorough: https://archive.is/wqdkF > "He would ask us to do personal things for him," one of these people said. "He said, 'I need you to write a briefing for me on Russian history and politics.' [...] We had abs…

We have not heard the story from all sides with zero bias. So why are we making authoritative conclusions? Some of these threads feels like celebrity tabloid gossip.

Edit: Absolutely baffled by the downvotes. Do we really, truly, factually know all sides of the story? What's the disagreement here?

Re: After DeepMind’s cofounder was placed on leave for bullying, Google promoted him

#74

I see a lot of people saying this seems not a big deal, or that his leadership deserved promotion. It’s because this is a second order article. The original, most substantive source that I could find is quite thorough: https://archive.is/wqdkF > "He would ask us to do personal things for him," one of these people said. "He said, 'I need you to write a briefing for me on Russian history and politics.' [...] We had abs…

The complaints in the article sound ridiculous. He wrote "the F* word" in an email? He fired people? He sometimes got angry? Maybe he just is a human being. People seem to feel entitled to godlike father figures as bosses now, who pamper them all the way in their comfy 9 to 5 jobs? Not saying you should scream at your employees, but humans can get angry and in general are not perfect. If it is too much for you, quit.…

>> Multiple people said Suleyman would sometimes scream at employees in group meetings and one-on-ones.

This is the behavior you're excusing? If my boss screamed at me, I would tell them to fuck off. I'm shocked you think this is OK behavior, especially from a Google executive.

People are human which means we sometimes lose our cool, but it also means, hey I'm a human so don't fucking scream at me.

Re: After DeepMind’s cofounder was placed on leave for bullying, Google promoted him

#75
If you are a really smart, hardworking, gifted producer - you should probably do that. The essence of people management is about maximizing the results of each individual, developing them and building a team that is more productive than just the sum of the parts. It's a very different skill set and deployment of energy.

Re: After DeepMind’s cofounder was placed on leave for bullying, Google promoted him

#76
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Only 1.3 percent of students drop out of Oxford, versus 7.4 percent for the UK. https://www.ox.ac.uk/about/facts-and-figures/full-version-fa... Not at all like America where only 1/3 graduate.

In elite schools [edit: that are as elite as] Oxford, the drop out rate would be close to Oxford's. The US numbers are pretty skewed by the massive drop out rate in 2-year community colleges, which both admit huge numbers of people and have very high dropout rates. Also, a huge percentage of dropouts are in the first year, when people are deciding that college may not work for them or be the right fit.

> In elite schools like Oxford, the drop out rate would be close to Oxford's

Typo?

Lots of US 4 year colleges have terrible graduation rates. It’s not just community colleges.

The UK also doesn’t have a culture of “drop out and start your own company.”

Re: After DeepMind’s cofounder was placed on leave for bullying, Google promoted him

#77

I see a lot of people saying this seems not a big deal, or that his leadership deserved promotion. It’s because this is a second order article. The original, most substantive source that I could find is quite thorough: https://archive.is/wqdkF > "He would ask us to do personal things for him," one of these people said. "He said, 'I need you to write a briefing for me on Russian history and politics.' [...] We had abs…

>> Behavior patterns were not productive.

I agree with you on success often being in spite of, or regardless of negative traits. That said, there are quite a lot of arseholes at the top... or maybe being at the top allows arseholes to indulge.

Jobs, by most accounts, was a real arsehole. Musk, by some reports, at least at time. Gates too, had a reputation for nastiness. Lots of professors are known for bullying and meanness. Film directors, rock stars.... In fact, most people have encountered areshole bosses at some point.

I'm not saying that arseholery isn't a problem. There's just sense of willful ignorance here. No one wants to admit that they tolerate arseholes in positions of power, but most everyone has them. Creating an environment of no tolerance would be novel, probably hard.

Re: After DeepMind’s cofounder was placed on leave for bullying, Google promoted him

#78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The fact that we are having this conversation. And if engineering wants to grow past its problems it has got to change. (edit: the previous part of this disparaged those on the spectrum and I am sorry)

Can we not imply that "on the spectrum" means being an asshole? Autism causes a lot of social difficulties, but it has nothing to do with publicly humiliating people on purpose to make yourself feel powerful.

I did imply that. And it's an unfortunate consequence that sometimes those on the spectrum can exhibit "asshole" like behavior but one does not need to be autistic to be an asshole so I've made a false equivalency and I am sorry.

What I was trying to get at is that all this hero worship of sociopathic myopic founders and 100x engineers who "get results" that somehow gives them license to be assholes, we've transcended that.

Re: After DeepMind’s cofounder was placed on leave for bullying, Google promoted him

#79
post #27

This guy appears to be a self-styled liberal activist operating in the business world. According to this fawning Business Insider piece (did his PR agent write it?), he has tried his hand at fixing climate change, inequality, health care, AI ethics, and so on. https://www.businessinsider.com/mustafa-suleyman-the-lefty-a... He dropped out of his degree at Oxford and then founded a telephone helpline for Muslim youths.…

> Who drops out of Oxford unless it’s to start a business? You’d almost think he was an intelligence asset of something.

I think you've been smoking too much weed my friend.

Re: After DeepMind’s cofounder was placed on leave for bullying, Google promoted him

#80
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Demanding random, pointless tasks from subordinates is a bad sign, but the Russia example might not be one of those. If a boss needs information s/he can ask a subordinate to make a brief. Sometimes the reasoning behind the important request is not clear to the subordinate and it might seem pointless. A good boss would generally explain, but failing to do it is still very very far from bullying (plus, some important…

Well, I write software. If you randomly ask me to write a brief history of Japanese factories, I’m going to be like wtf. You’re going to have to explain yourself. I won’t do it for the Elongated Muskrat himself.

That is perfectly reasonable. Someone else might gladly learn something interesting on the company dime, even if the topic seems unrelated to the job. For example, if my employers offers me a sailing, woodworking or machining class (neither of which has anything to do with what I work on) I will take it. Sausage making -- I will pass; not my kettle of fish.
Post reply on HN