In internal memo, Apple addresses concerns around new Photo scanning features
11–20 of 430 posts
Re: In internal memo, Apple addresses concerns around new Photo scanning features
#12"the screeching voices of the minority" is how they refer to those who value privacy...
Technically that description was from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, not from anyone at Apple.
Re: In internal memo, Apple addresses concerns around new Photo scanning features
#13Re: In internal memo, Apple addresses concerns around new Photo scanning features
#14"the screeching voices of the minority" is how they refer to those who value privacy...
It's shocking to me that they don't even acklowege the critisms and fully ignore them. It would be one thing if they said that the potential implications are worth it, but they don't even acklowege them.
Re: In internal memo, Apple addresses concerns around new Photo scanning features
#15Re: In internal memo, Apple addresses concerns around new Photo scanning features
#16A system on my phone where it has a list of bad files and a threshold on how many of those files are allowed. If the threshold is reached Apple can read them. Both the bad files list and threshold is controlled by Apple and is explicitly designed to be un-auditable... Honestly I would have been fine with Apple scanning my all photos after they are uploaded to iCloud but this is deeply disturbing
You can't audit anything Apple does on their servers.
Re: In internal memo, Apple addresses concerns around new Photo scanning features
#17A system on my phone where it has a list of bad files and a threshold on how many of those files are allowed. If the threshold is reached Apple can read them. Both the bad files list and threshold is controlled by Apple and is explicitly designed to be un-auditable... Honestly I would have been fine with Apple scanning my all photos after they are uploaded to iCloud but this is deeply disturbing
How is this system, where Apple sees far less photos, worse? You can't audit anything Apple does on their servers.
First terrorist content, then "misinformation", then political speech. Apple will be unable to resist government demands to use this preexisting backdoor with a different set of perceptual hashes.
Re: In internal memo, Apple addresses concerns around new Photo scanning features
#18Re: In internal memo, Apple addresses concerns around new Photo scanning features
#19The NCMEC director claimed "many thousands of sexually exploited victimized children will be rescued" because of this system. It can't detect new abuse images if I understand correctly. And don't most arrests happen after a victim talks to another adult? Or someone notices signs? Are many thousands of active child molesters discovered through scanning online photos?
IMO posession of CSAM should be legal but heavily regulated, so that users who don't want to hurt children (probably will most of them) cooperate with authorities to investigate producer (child abusers), get connected to mental health care, and not be driven into a criminal underworld full of blackmail.
Re: In internal memo, Apple addresses concerns around new Photo scanning features
#20A system on my phone where it has a list of bad files and a threshold on how many of those files are allowed. If the threshold is reached Apple can read them. Both the bad files list and threshold is controlled by Apple and is explicitly designed to be un-auditable... Honestly I would have been fine with Apple scanning my all photos after they are uploaded to iCloud but this is deeply disturbing
How is this system, where Apple sees far less photos, worse? You can't audit anything Apple does on their servers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hash_collision
option three : don't allow Apple to judge user data at all.