Earlier quoted context omitted.
That was... my point? My point is that "black person" is a problematic and overloaded descriptor. It can imply a cultural group ("american black culture") to which a light-skinned person can belong (can't they?) and which it should be tolerable to criticize. It can also imply a simple physical descriptor of traits belonging to African-descended people. Is an ethnic Nigerian born and raised there black? Do they belong…
>That was... my point? My point is that "black person" is a problematic and overloaded descriptor. It can imply a cultural group ("american black culture") to which a light-skinned person can belong (can't they?) and which it should be tolerable to criticize. I literally wrote "Majority of Black Americans...who come in many different pigments" > It can also imply a simple physical descriptor of traits belonging to Af…
"A lot of hispanic countries have problems with drug cartels, crime and corruption"
vs.
"A lot of black communities have problems with drugs, violence and poor educational outcomes"
It's pretty easy to accuse the latter statement of being racist isn't it? Not so much the former though huh? Why do you think that is?