Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Reddit clone built in no-code in two weeks

reggit.bubbleapps.io

31–40 of 176 posts

Re: Show HN: Reddit clone built in no-code in two weeks

#31
post #13

One of the problems with examples like this is that it gives an unrealistic expectation to non-technical people that large & complex sites are actually quite basic. There is a lot of functionality that a typical user never sees and is often where the complexity lies. And as the "app too busy" error message proves, there is a lot more to a site than it's front end alone and cloning a front end does not clone performan…

> And as the "app too busy" error message proves, there is a lot more to a site than it's front end alone I get at least monthly "our servers are busy" messages when accessing Reddit, and their (redesigned) website is so bloated that it takes great effort to replicate such bad performance in a simple clone. Reddit is the one site where you really can't make this argument, it's bloat incarnate.

It does handle many orders of magnitude more users than this thing does though. As a site that is the source of many hugs of death, it's serving a hell of a lot of traffic, mostly successfully.

It could serve even more traffic if it was less bloated of course.

EDIT: Some random stats from 2019 suggest that they're handling ~1000 pageviews a second on average over a month, and a view can take >100 requests to load. Combine with surge load and you're dealing with some serious requests per second.

Re: Show HN: Reddit clone built in no-code in two weeks

#32

Dreamweaver 3.0? Wasn't there some IDE like that in the past where non technical people could build data driven apps visually? I don't remember then name of that application. Wasn't it related to Microsoft Access or something? Hmm, the name eludes me...

Why is there an otherwise helpful response to this that is already downvoted to [dead]?

edit: It's back now, but I notice this happening a lot more than it used to. folks, for pete's sake if you find something inaccurate or unsupported in a post that causes you to want it gone, at least support your point with a comment for folks like me. Clueless people like myself end up wondering what the hell I just walked in on when it's dead comment after dead comment that otherwise seem like rational points in an interesting discussion.

Re: Show HN: Reddit clone built in no-code in two weeks

#34
post #14
post #2

Slow as hell, to the point it does not load. Isn't this the typical application you don't want to run as nocode? High loads, viral growth.

> Slow as hell, to the point it does not load. So it looks like they nailed it.

Yep, definitely the authentic new reddit experience.

Could even do twitter too.

Re: Show HN: Reddit clone built in no-code in two weeks

#38
I'm quite surprised that Bubble doesn't handle high traffic for you (no posts are loading for me and the site took ages to render anything), because I can't imagine that's something you can sort of plug in yourself somehow. Fair enough if they didn't actually intend for you to deploy or market your app and it was just an excellent prototyping tool, but their website does say "empowering entrepreneurs to build production-ready web apps." Surely you have to do something to help people's production ready apps serve production traffic if you're in this space.

I guess it's to do with their pricing tier. At $115/mo you get "3 units of server capacity", I assume you get 1 below that since they don't say. So the free tier has Bubble branding and insufficient hardware for the apps you can build, which seems a bit of an awkward marketing situation I guess.

To be fair their "Production" tier at $475/mo has "10 units of server capacity". So maybe they do empower entrepeneurs who want to spend $475/mo on hosting to build production-ready web apps. Which is certainly cheaper than a dev team if their code and 10x server capacity works for most apps.

Re: Show HN: Reddit clone built in no-code in two weeks

#40
Hey HN:

Thanks for everyone who has tried to visit the site. The surge in traffic was unexpected, and I realize that it slowed down the load time, so I've added a 'boost' to the site.

Besides that, I should also clarify that this site was built to be 'web first'. It currently does not work on mobile (I didn't design it to work on mobile since I was only working on it for 2 weeks).

Hope the site loads better now. Will try to respond to other comments below

Post reply on HN