Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's no doubt that Apple makes good hardware. But you can find decent hardware elsewhere, even at lower cost and with better configurability. Everyone betting on the same horse is usually a bad strategy. By the way, here's what Linus Torvalds (the creator of Linux) thinks about using the M1: https://www.zdnet.com/article/linus-torvalds-would-like-to-u...
> But you can find decent hardware elsewhere, even at lower cost and with better configurability. The problem is, you pay the same price for a Thinkpad/Elitebook and you get ridiculous gotchas like missing wireless antennas (at most you can find 2x2, if you're lucky). Or the configuration you like doesn't come to your country, or the vendor doesn't allow custom configuration for your country unless you buy 10+, etc.…
Apple enabling client-side CSAM scanning on iPhone tomorrow
631–640 of 757 posts
Re: Apple enabling client-side CSAM scanning on iPhone tomorrow
#632Earlier quoted context omitted.
You could run Mobian or similar on a phone from Purism/Pine/etc. Problem is you end up with a vastly inferior hardware device that costs nearly as much as an iPhone. I’m still waiting for my Librem 5 preorder. Would love to hear if anyone is actually using a Linux phone and enjoying it.
This is clearly a good thing to do and supporting those projects is great. So far though, they do nothing to solve the problems we are talking about. The software is not anywhere near audited, and even if it were, you are still interacting with people and services who are using unaudited software.
Many of the projects leverage a well known OS as their base (e.g. pmOS uses Alpine Linux, Mobian uses Debian), and actively ensure that anything that can be upstreamed is upstreamed. So it's not like you're downloading some random ROM off of XDA.
Re: Apple enabling client-side CSAM scanning on iPhone tomorrow
#633I'm really conflicted about this. For context, I deeply hate the abuse of children and I've worked on a contract before that landed 12 human traffickers in custody that were smuggling sex slaves across boarders. I didn't need to know details about the victims in question, but it's understood that they're often teenagers or children. So my initial reaction when reading this Twitter thread was "let's get these bastards…
Re: Apple enabling client-side CSAM scanning on iPhone tomorrow
#634Earlier quoted context omitted.
The warning: "Don't buy Apple products, their locked down hardware and walled garden is going to be trouble" People: Ignore warning, buy iPhone You: "Don't buy Apple products" isn't an action.
The alternative is? Google phone? This is not an alternative if you care about privacy. The allegory presented sounds insane (growing your own food) but honestly if you're not rolling your own flashed ROM on a 'droid then your privacy is dead already; I understand throwing all your eggs in one basket is a terrible idea but Apples walled garden and heavy sandboxing was at least somewhat protective.
Re: Apple enabling client-side CSAM scanning on iPhone tomorrow
#635Re: Apple enabling client-side CSAM scanning on iPhone tomorrow
#636Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Problem is you end up with a vastly inferior hardware device that costs nearly as much as an iPhone. The Pinephone is $150/$200. > Would love to hear if anyone is actually using a Linux phone and enjoying it. I have one, and I throughly enjoy it! One of the neatest things about it, and I still have to wrap my head around it, is that it can do anything you can do on a desktop. SSH? No problem? Dev environment? "apt…
> One of the neatest things about it, and I still have to wrap my head around it, is that it can do anything you can do on a desktop. SSH? No problem? Dev environment? "apt install build-essentials". Want to install XFCE? Knock yourself out! You can do all these things with a $10 raspberry pi-w. It’s not obvious why it helps with having security and privacy.
The person asked: "Would love to hear if anyone is actually using a Linux phone and enjoying it."
...so I responded about what I enjoy about using a "Linux Phone". A "$10 raspberry pi-w" is not a Linux Phone.
The question didn't address "security and privacy", so I didn't add it. Though, since you brought it up, I will answer how the Pinephone "helps with having security and privacy".
- I have hardware (cut physical power) switches to kill the Microphone, cameras (independent for front and back), and Wifi/Bluetooth.
- I am running a full GNU/Linux distro that I have a lot more confidence in their want to protect users security/privacy.
- I can run software of my choosing on it (the Pinephone actually defaults to booting on an SD card! so it encourages you to experiement with OSes).
- There is serious effort to run the mainline Linux kernel on it, so it will not be artifically obsolete in 3-5 years (or be sutck on running some ancient swiss cheese kernel in 5 years like my old Pixel/Nexus devices).
- I don't have to install/link to some opaque binaries to even boot the system.
I'm sure I can think of more, but that's all I have for now.
Re: Apple enabling client-side CSAM scanning on iPhone tomorrow
#637Earlier quoted context omitted.
If Apple thought this kind of dragnet was a losing political fight that tells me they've become too weak to stand up to unreasonable government demands. Where is the company that won the public opinion battle over unlocking a mass shooter's phone?
This isn’t a government demand . This is something the public cares deeply about, and Apple is solving it their own way. Public opinion is not in favor of giving safe harbor to pedophiles and child pornographers, and I can’t see why anyone would even want Apple to fight that battle.
Re: Apple enabling client-side CSAM scanning on iPhone tomorrow
#638Earlier quoted context omitted.
> One of the neatest things about it, and I still have to wrap my head around it, is that it can do anything you can do on a desktop. SSH? No problem? Dev environment? "apt install build-essentials". Want to install XFCE? Knock yourself out! You can do all these things with a $10 raspberry pi-w. It’s not obvious why it helps with having security and privacy.
Respectfully, I think you missed the point of my reply. The person asked: "Would love to hear if anyone is actually using a Linux phone and enjoying it." ...so I responded about what I enjoy about using a "Linux Phone". A "$10 raspberry pi-w" is not a Linux Phone. The question didn't address "security and privacy", so I didn't add it. Though, since you brought it up, I will answer how the Pinephone "helps with having…
Re: Apple enabling client-side CSAM scanning on iPhone tomorrow
#639Earlier quoted context omitted.
Fwiw, Apple's incentive seems to be hardware from the outside more than Software, imo. They tend to sell the hardware by the software for a lot of people, but given that they're so concerned with keeping their software on their hardware i suspect they don't have much reason to push their software over your software. What would concern me is if we see a big revenue stream from their software. Then i'd question them no…
Are you kidding? After getting a taste of the revenue-potential of software in the App Store, it is inevitable that Apple wants more of it. In fact, I predict that Apple will at one point start selling software as a subscription, like SaaS. Other OSes don't fit in that model.
The day apple wants it's OS anywhere it can get it, because it brings in money independent of just it's hardware is the day i actually believe Apple cares about the software revenue.
Right now Apple's software is hardware locked. Google by comparison cares much more about the software side than Apple, imo.
Re: Apple enabling client-side CSAM scanning on iPhone tomorrow
#640Earlier quoted context omitted.
This isn’t a government demand . This is something the public cares deeply about, and Apple is solving it their own way. Public opinion is not in favor of giving safe harbor to pedophiles and child pornographers, and I can’t see why anyone would even want Apple to fight that battle.
Not sure where you got that information. I haven't seen any official announcements, so I assumed based on it being US-only and rolled out with no fanfare (except critical press stories citing unnamed sources) that it's something the FBI asked for.
What we do know is that it is a proprietary solution using a proprietary hash which only applies to Apple products and that Apple has always presented themselves as a family friendly company that doesn’t support criminal use cases.
Everything points to this being something Apple thinks needs to be solved before the public asks why they haven’t.
If it was a government demand, we’d presumably see Google responding to it too.
You still haven’t explained why not working to deter pedophiles and child pornographers, is an important battle for them to fight.
They might think it’s a problem they want to solve on their own terms, and that would seem to be what they have done here.
Not solving a problem people care about just because the government also cares about it seems illogical. I think a lot of people like the idea of corporations taking responsibility for the social problems they cause without needing to be forced to do so by the government.