Live data from Hacker News

Airyx OS

airyx.org

91–100 of 258 posts

Re: Airyx OS

#91

>It builds on the solid foundations of FreeBSD Why not build on Darwin which basically forms macOS's core? And how it differs from helloSystem?

> Why not build on Darwin which basically forms macOS's core?

Possibly because of greater hardware compatibility.

Re: Airyx OS

#92
Not to diminish the effort, but I think replicating the look and design (as in how things work) of MacOS (or Windows 10) is a pitfall that very few alternative OS developers manage to avoid.

It's just a bad idea. They'll never get even close, and those screenshots on Imgur prove it.

What I'd prefer is if these definitely brilliant developers would "own" the Unix history more, and build upon Motif. Put the effort do create a mimicry of MacOS into modernising Motif. Hopefully not just make the chrome translucent, but really think about how Motif would look if invented in 2021.

Re: Airyx OS

#93
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I probably missed a lot of things, but didn’t Gnome already achieve this? Weren’t most of the people behind its design from Apple?

Ubuntu's Unity was a lot more macOS-like with the default global menu bar, then they gave up on it :( Gnome doesn't even have a menu bar anymore, preferring apps use a single hamburger menu.

Yeah I recently switched from macOS to a Gnome-using variant of Linux (Pop!_OS 21.04, which overall I really like and recommend if you are of the "I want to do my specific work and not tinker with my OS much" mindset like I am) and this design choice blew my mind.

I'm OK with a global menu bar, or app-window menu bar, but hiding everything behind a stupid hamburger thing on a desktop computer?

Weird choice IMO. I'm just living with it, though, since I don't really want to fuck around with my system itself.

Re: Airyx OS

#94

No screenshots for a GUI-centric OS? Seriously?

I wonder if the reason is that it looks really unpolished (there are some screenshots on Imgur). Those sidebars would get your team fired at Apple.

If this isn't the final look then I apologise.

Re: Airyx OS

#95
post #92

Not to diminish the effort, but I think replicating the look and design (as in how things work) of MacOS (or Windows 10) is a pitfall that very few alternative OS developers manage to avoid. It's just a bad idea. They'll never get even close, and those screenshots on Imgur prove it. What I'd prefer is if these definitely brilliant developers would "own" the Unix history more, and build upon Motif. Put the effort do c…

> It's just a bad idea. They'll never get even close, and those screenshots on Imgur prove it.

It's a great idea. Because developing your own look and feel for the entire OS is an enormous task. This way you at least have a foundation to build upon.

Re: Airyx OS

#96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, building software for iOS is possible on other platforms although this is against the terms of the Apple developer agreement.

> this is against the terms of the Apple developer agreement. Of course it is Heaven forbid we have any choices at all.

To be fair, Macs are one of the best choices out there, so I'm not complaining. The only thing that sucks on Macs nowadays for devs is how poor Docker is performing, even with all the workarounds like Docker-sync etc.

Re: Airyx OS

#97
post #92

Not to diminish the effort, but I think replicating the look and design (as in how things work) of MacOS (or Windows 10) is a pitfall that very few alternative OS developers manage to avoid. It's just a bad idea. They'll never get even close, and those screenshots on Imgur prove it. What I'd prefer is if these definitely brilliant developers would "own" the Unix history more, and build upon Motif. Put the effort do c…

> It's just a bad idea. They'll never get even close, and those screenshots on Imgur prove it. It's a great idea. Because developing your own look and feel for the entire OS is an enormous task. This way you at least have a foundation to build upon.

As I'm saying, to choose MacOS or Windows 10 as your foundation is a dead-end. Many have tried before.

If you read my comment, you'd have read that I propose to look to the history of Unix as the foundation.

Re: Airyx OS

#98
post #92

Not to diminish the effort, but I think replicating the look and design (as in how things work) of MacOS (or Windows 10) is a pitfall that very few alternative OS developers manage to avoid. It's just a bad idea. They'll never get even close, and those screenshots on Imgur prove it. What I'd prefer is if these definitely brilliant developers would "own" the Unix history more, and build upon Motif. Put the effort do c…

You want developers to start with the clunky design, poor usability and terrible implementation of Motif?

Re: Airyx OS

#99
post #92

Not to diminish the effort, but I think replicating the look and design (as in how things work) of MacOS (or Windows 10) is a pitfall that very few alternative OS developers manage to avoid. It's just a bad idea. They'll never get even close, and those screenshots on Imgur prove it. What I'd prefer is if these definitely brilliant developers would "own" the Unix history more, and build upon Motif. Put the effort do c…

> It's just a bad idea. They'll never get even close, and those screenshots on Imgur prove it. It's a great idea. Because developing your own look and feel for the entire OS is an enormous task. This way you at least have a foundation to build upon.

It looks like a counterfeit operating system though.

Re: Airyx OS

#100
post #98
post #92

Not to diminish the effort, but I think replicating the look and design (as in how things work) of MacOS (or Windows 10) is a pitfall that very few alternative OS developers manage to avoid. It's just a bad idea. They'll never get even close, and those screenshots on Imgur prove it. What I'd prefer is if these definitely brilliant developers would "own" the Unix history more, and build upon Motif. Put the effort do c…

You want developers to start with the clunky design, poor usability and terrible implementation of Motif?

Yep.
Post reply on HN