Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your example is already biased, because you use Walmart as the other option. Walmart already came through and blew away the local mom and pop market in these rural areas. Are they more convenient than driving an hour to a walmart? probably. I've seen small family run stores go out of business specifically because they can't compete with a dollar general that opened a mile away. "Deeply beneficial" seems like a strong…
For anyone reading this thread who still has an open mind, I recommend this 2009 episode of the EconTalk podcast that talks about actually working at Walmart and how supposedly-great the "mom and pops" were before Walmart took over: https://www.econtalk.org/platt-on-working-at-wal-mart/ The truth about the mom and pops is that they had very limited selection, high prices, long delivery times, and often were owned by…
You imply this is undesirable. Care to elaborate? A large talking point during the protests last year was businesses in Black communities being owned by people outside those communities, or more often than not, by large corporations.
Or are you suggesting that a lot of the owners actually owned multiple such shops and that this isn't true for the shops that replaced them?