Live data from Hacker News

What Happened to the Future?

foundersfund.com

101–110 of 113 posts

Re: What Happened to the Future?

#101
Nicely written essay. I would say future is hard to predict. People in 1960s predicted about space travel but did not predict mobile devices like iphones that have so much compute power with so many apps with location, touch, social, communication features.

140 characters may not have great technology but can be attributed to bring social revolution in so many places.

Ultimately, need is mother of most of innovations. Need leads to demand, which leads to building new solutions.

Re: What Happened to the Future?

#102
People knock Webvan around but the founder (Mick Mountz), 10 years after that debacle, founded http://www.kivasystems.com/ where instead of conveyor belts (Webvan) they use robots for managing a warehouse. Seriously cool robotics. Check out the videos on their site.

Kiva Systems has gone from strength to strength and is now used by Zappos, Wallgreens and others (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiva_Systems)

Re: What Happened to the Future?

#103

It's a good essay. The only problem is that it's Peter Thiel behind it. The problem isn't just that "we got 140 characters." The problem is that Peter Thiel asked for it by investing in and therefore promulgating Mark Zuckerberg's vision of ubiquitous irrelevance. I think he's right that VC is destroying itself by investing in what I have often referred to as trivial nonsense, but he and his firm are part of the prob…

The intro video on your website made Chrome warn me of an insecure script. Just thought you should know, since security warnings arn't the best thing to show on a payments website.

Re: What Happened to the Future?

#104

It's a good essay. The only problem is that it's Peter Thiel behind it. The problem isn't just that "we got 140 characters." The problem is that Peter Thiel asked for it by investing in and therefore promulgating Mark Zuckerberg's vision of ubiquitous irrelevance. I think he's right that VC is destroying itself by investing in what I have often referred to as trivial nonsense, but he and his firm are part of the prob…

Since you brought it up, I'm gonna say it: Facecash is a bad idea, poorly executed. None of the 4+ apps that you are offering are compelling. The basic POS thing is never going to work. It's not obviously better but involves set up by both the buyer and seller. And it's kinds of weird ("Sign with your face"??). But then there's a loyalty scheme layered on top. But without any traction on either side, that's not going to work. With money transfers, you should at least copy PayPal to address the chicken and egg problem: let people transfer to an email address or phone number so that the service only requires the sender to be signed up and enabled. Splitting checks is either a small or just bad idea. That's just not a big problem for most people and not one that most would pay to "solve".

Finally, we get it, the government sucks when it comes to making laws like those that make starting up a money transmitter company harder. But other entrepreneurs seem to have addressed it. There are a variety of ways to approach it. For one, use a partner for the transmission part and focus on what you think your added-value is. It would be quite easy to layer a face/barcode scheme on top of PayPal, for example. If you can prove it out, then you're in a better position to handle the money transmission yourself. And might be able to interest investors.

Re: What Happened to the Future?

#105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

but for a number of reasons, it shouldn't take that long. I totally hear you. It _shouldn't_, but it does. I know we've talked about this before, Aaron, but I think you have to work like hell for the next 6 months to get people using _some part of your system. You've had uptake in libraries... try to get your system in as many libraries as possible. Get some press for that uptake and traction. You do this really well…

Unfortunately, domestic money transmission is illegal is California as of July 1st without a license. The only way around that is money, and I'm not willing to do jailtime for traction. http://www.facecash.com/legal/ca.html

Get out of California then. Go to Nevada, Texas, Washington, anywhere that will be friendly at the moment to your idea. Seriously. Do what ever it takes to climb that mountain.

Re: What Happened to the Future?

#106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unfortunately, domestic money transmission is illegal is California as of July 1st without a license. The only way around that is money, and I'm not willing to do jailtime for traction. http://www.facecash.com/legal/ca.html

Get out of California then. Go to Nevada, Texas, Washington, anywhere that will be friendly at the moment to your idea. Seriously. Do what ever it takes to climb that mountain.

That's not how the law works. It's a California law that applies nationwide. (Read the link.)

Re: What Happened to the Future?

#107
post #104

It's a good essay. The only problem is that it's Peter Thiel behind it. The problem isn't just that "we got 140 characters." The problem is that Peter Thiel asked for it by investing in and therefore promulgating Mark Zuckerberg's vision of ubiquitous irrelevance. I think he's right that VC is destroying itself by investing in what I have often referred to as trivial nonsense, but he and his firm are part of the prob…

Since you brought it up, I'm gonna say it: Facecash is a bad idea, poorly executed. None of the 4+ apps that you are offering are compelling. The basic POS thing is never going to work. It's not obviously better but involves set up by both the buyer and seller. And it's kinds of weird ("Sign with your face"??). But then there's a loyalty scheme layered on top. But without any traction on either side, that's not going…

Thanks for your feedback. It's pretty clear that despite your background you don't understand what we're doing.

Re: What Happened to the Future?

#108

It's a good essay. The only problem is that it's Peter Thiel behind it. The problem isn't just that "we got 140 characters." The problem is that Peter Thiel asked for it by investing in and therefore promulgating Mark Zuckerberg's vision of ubiquitous irrelevance. I think he's right that VC is destroying itself by investing in what I have often referred to as trivial nonsense, but he and his firm are part of the prob…

Facebook has improved your life. You got to publish a book about it.

I really hope you're kidding.

Re: What Happened to the Future?

#109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Facebook has improved your life. You got to publish a book about it.

I really hope you're kidding.

In my narrative I construct my identity through my thoughts, emotions, intentions and conflicts; my desires. Other people judge me by my results.

Re: What Happened to the Future?

#110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Get out of California then. Go to Nevada, Texas, Washington, anywhere that will be friendly at the moment to your idea. Seriously. Do what ever it takes to climb that mountain.

That's not how the law works. It's a California law that applies nationwide. (Read the link.)

Then you don't do business in california for the time being until you get that funding to pay for all the paperwork.
Post reply on HN