11–20 of 48 posts
You say it’s faster, but fail to provide any numbers / a jsPerf test case. I’m sure it’s faster to execute `waituntilexists()` initially, but if you take into account it uses an 5ms interval in which it traverses the DOM for the same elements over and over again until they’re finally found, it seems it probably has a negative impact on performance overall.
What’s wrong with event delegation anyway?
But your code should be faster -because you are polling at the 5ms interval!
You know how you can accelerate your page even further? Don't use 1.49mb large GIF animations as background images...
"it's faster" - but where are the numbers?
The polling approach is already used in the YUI2' onAvailable method. http://yui.yahooapis.com/2.9.0/build/event/event.js But your code should be faster -because you are polling at the 5ms interval!
Something like this should be built-in in jQuery. You can do $(document).ready(), why not, the admittedly syntax sugared, $("div#main").ready().
You know how you can accelerate your page even further? Don't use 1.49mb large GIF animations as background images...
this is why we need vote counts to be displayed again.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
this is why we need vote counts to be displayed again.
I'm all for bringing back vote counts, I do sorely miss them... but I have to ask, in this particular case, how would mankind be served if we knew that 127 more people agree with cstuder? Maybe I'm missing something, this is an honest question.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
this is why we need vote counts to be displayed again.
I'm all for bringing back vote counts, I do sorely miss them... but I have to ask, in this particular case, how would mankind be served if we knew that 127 more people agree with cstuder? Maybe I'm missing something, this is an honest question.
In short, as-is, the OP really has no way of knowing just how aggravating his site is.