Live data from Hacker News

The cost of two weeks in an pediatric/infant ICU

kingsley.sh

21–30 of 294 posts

Re: The cost of two weeks in an pediatric/infant ICU

#21
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If you have a percentage copay, say 10%, they will tell you to pay $25k because it's 10% [of $250k], but they might only pay $75k [after negotiating the $250k down to $75k]. That's fraud.

250k not 2.5M. But yes I agree the practice seems fraudulent.

oops yes you're right, fixed.

Re: The cost of two weeks in an pediatric/infant ICU

#22
post #2

I don't understand how people can be so anti-universal healthcare in the US. When you have an $8k deductible, your insurance is basically a gift to the CEO's yacht fund.

There are really bad things with the current system, but you asked a question.

People are exposed on a regular basis to the DMV, the SBA, to Social Security or to Medicare. Then they compare that experience with the avg experience with a commercial insurer, and it does feel like a better experience (of course, if their employer can afford it)

Worse, there are stories of friends in places like CAN, where insider doctors hurriedly email their friends about a new doctor X that is available for appointments, in order to skip a 6 month wait...

The system in the US is a mess, but those people reason that its the least worst option of the available choices.

If they could be given a 3rd or 4th choice, like for example, make take health insurance companies and turn them into public utilities so the "CEO" is not getting his "yatch fund" from taxpayers, that's worth talking about (as longas you don't forget to look to CA, and their wonderful brownouts + utility-enabled wildfires)

Re: The cost of two weeks in an pediatric/infant ICU

#23
post #2

I don't understand how people can be so anti-universal healthcare in the US. When you have an $8k deductible, your insurance is basically a gift to the CEO's yacht fund.

At least with some caveats, like less funds for 35+ year old parents.

Re: The cost of two weeks in an pediatric/infant ICU

#24
post #10
post #2

I don't understand how people can be so anti-universal healthcare in the US. When you have an $8k deductible, your insurance is basically a gift to the CEO's yacht fund.

Your comment misses the point. There are two reasons why this bill is so high: 1. Some doctors and some hospitals are make tremendous amount of money - hospital revenue is about $1T and doctor revenue is about .5T. 2. This country has an insatiable demand for expensive healthcare. There’s no country with universal coverage where a child with little chance for survival would have received this level of care.

The UK gives this level of care to many people routinely.

Re: The cost of two weeks in an pediatric/infant ICU

#25
post #2

I don't understand how people can be so anti-universal healthcare in the US. When you have an $8k deductible, your insurance is basically a gift to the CEO's yacht fund.

Single payer healthcare systems in Europe were introduced a long time ago. Back then, politics was different, not least because of an imminent threat of the Soviet Bloc just around the corner and a need to answer it by "carrot", too, not just "stick". They are now status quo, but in another version of history, where such systems would have to be introduced today , I am not certain whether they could clear the politic…

Efforts at introducing single-payer healthcare in the U.S. go back at least as far as 1935.

https://www.healthcare-now.org/legislation/national-timeline...

Re: The cost of two weeks in an pediatric/infant ICU

#26
post #14
post #3

A quarter million US dollars. Of course the hospital never expects to receive this amount of money. Either they will negotiate it down for uninsured patients, or they will accept a lesser amount from the insurance company. Insurance companies like this over representation of costs because: 1. If you have a percentage copay (edit: "coinsurance"), say 10%, they will tell you to pay $25k because it's 10%, but they might…

> If you have a percentage copay, say 10%, they will tell you to pay $25k because it's 10%, but they might only pay $75k. In this example you clearly paid 25% but they tell you it's only 10%. I think this is coinsurance, not copay. Copay is the $50 (or whatever) flat fee you pay every time you see a specialist. Coinsurance is a percentage of costs that you share with the insurance company, up to some maximum out of p…

A lot of insurance companies will have a 10-20% coinsurance for hospital visits, not a traditional co-pay like you went to a specialist. That 10-20% goes against the deductible, so depending on the bill you might not even pay the full 10% because it hits your deductible max.

Edit: I was informed that it's not 10% co-pay but coinsurance. So I updated my post to reflect that.

Re: The cost of two weeks in an pediatric/infant ICU

#27
post #13
post #2

I don't understand how people can be so anti-universal healthcare in the US. When you have an $8k deductible, your insurance is basically a gift to the CEO's yacht fund.

The US has universal care, it passed in 2009 and it establishes that everyone does their part and buy insurance. It establishes help for low income individuals. There are caps on annual expenses. You may not like how it’s structured. You may not like the amount that people are expected to pay. But twelve years later the only people who don’t have coverage are people who are not meeting their civic obligations. And I’…

> But twelve years later the only people who don’t have coverage are people who are not meeting their civic obligations.

The folks at the poverty line with a "free" fully subsidized Bronze ACA plan has an enormous deductible that may be $6-12k before that coverage actually starts paying out. The ACA's max out-of-pocket for a family in 2021 is $17,100. (https://www.healthcare.gov/glossary/out-of-pocket-maximum-li...)

That's not meaningful access to healthcare for someone making $30k a year.

Re: The cost of two weeks in an pediatric/infant ICU

#28
post #3

A quarter million US dollars. Of course the hospital never expects to receive this amount of money. Either they will negotiate it down for uninsured patients, or they will accept a lesser amount from the insurance company. Insurance companies like this over representation of costs because: 1. If you have a percentage copay (edit: "coinsurance"), say 10%, they will tell you to pay $25k because it's 10%, but they might…

> If you have a percentage copay, say 10%, they will tell you to pay $25k because it's 10% [of $250k], but they might only pay $75k [after negotiating the $250k down to $75k]. That's fraud.

If you have enough $$$'s, you can probably argue that in court and win... But you'd just win a refund of some of the copay.

Re: The cost of two weeks in an pediatric/infant ICU

#29
post #2

I don't understand how people can be so anti-universal healthcare in the US. When you have an $8k deductible, your insurance is basically a gift to the CEO's yacht fund.

There are many problems with our Canadian system, it's certainly not perfect. And single payer is not the only way to approach this problem. But I'm overall happy with its compromises in our system. Like any economic resource, it's rationed. But it's rationed, generally, on the basis of need. And that "from each according to their abilities to each according to their needs" philosophy may be the ideological curse on it that will prevent it from ever having adoption in the US with its virulent anti-communist past. It would never happen in Canada now, it was a product of the 1960s and early 70s and the way things were then. And it's consistently under threat from its ideological foes here, even if it's immensely popular among the Canadian public.

What boggles my mind about the US system is the blatant way it makes working people dependant on employment for health coverage. In a way it's a form of feudalism, tying people physically to their employment.

Re: The cost of two weeks in an pediatric/infant ICU

#30
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If you have a percentage copay, say 10%, they will tell you to pay $25k because it's 10%, but they might only pay $75k. In this example you clearly paid 25% but they tell you it's only 10%. I think this is coinsurance, not copay. Copay is the $50 (or whatever) flat fee you pay every time you see a specialist. Coinsurance is a percentage of costs that you share with the insurance company, up to some maximum out of p…

A lot of insurance companies will have a 10-20% coinsurance for hospital visits, not a traditional co-pay like you went to a specialist. That 10-20% goes against the deductible, so depending on the bill you might not even pay the full 10% because it hits your deductible max. Edit: I was informed that it's not 10% co-pay but coinsurance. So I updated my post to reflect that.

That kind of cost sharing is called coinsurance, not copay.

Most policies have deductibles, coinsurance, and copays as types of cost sharing.

Coinsurance you pay is also against the amount that insurance pays (negotiated rate)

Post reply on HN