I don't know about you, but for me this feels like the gates of hell opening for patent trolls. AI can produce thousands of patents in a single day. As always patent trolls make no money from patents, but from the bureaucratic process. So a schema like this that allows virtually unlimited patents to be created will increase even more trolls misbehavior
South Africa issues world’s first patent listing AI as inventor
11–20 of 77 posts
Re: South Africa issues world’s first patent listing AI as inventor
#12clickbait..
Re: South Africa issues world’s first patent listing AI as inventor
#13I don't know about you, but for me this feels like the gates of hell opening for patent trolls. AI can produce thousands of patents in a single day. As always patent trolls make no money from patents, but from the bureaucratic process. So a schema like this that allows virtually unlimited patents to be created will increase even more trolls misbehavior
Then patent offices will generate adversarial AI review examiners. Together the AI trolls and AI examiners might for the first time produce true innovation out of the patent-giving process
Re: South Africa issues world’s first patent listing AI as inventor
#14Re: South Africa issues world’s first patent listing AI as inventor
#15I don't know about you, but for me this feels like the gates of hell opening for patent trolls. AI can produce thousands of patents in a single day. As always patent trolls make no money from patents, but from the bureaucratic process. So a schema like this that allows virtually unlimited patents to be created will increase even more trolls misbehavior
Re: South Africa issues world’s first patent listing AI as inventor
#16I don't know about you, but for me this feels like the gates of hell opening for patent trolls. AI can produce thousands of patents in a single day. As always patent trolls make no money from patents, but from the bureaucratic process. So a schema like this that allows virtually unlimited patents to be created will increase even more trolls misbehavior
Then patent offices will generate adversarial AI review examiners. Together the AI trolls and AI examiners might for the first time produce true innovation out of the patent-giving process
Re: South Africa issues world’s first patent listing AI as inventor
#17My hammer made a house, I merely own it
On the contrary, can a person paid to develop something be considered (partially) a tool?
“Tools do stuff, humans do stuff, are humans tools?” Is abuse of transitive property in an illogical way.
Re: South Africa issues world’s first patent listing AI as inventor
#18I wonder if there is an advantage to a company in not having a named human registered against their patent.
Re: South Africa issues world’s first patent listing AI as inventor
#19This is the patent application, as far as I can tell. And as others have noted, this is obviously a political stunt—the article makes that clear as well.
Frustratingly, it doesn't seem like there's anything interesting or useful happening in the actual patent. It would not surprise me to find that they had been rejected in part because the idea seems to be either literally impossible to implement or basically uninteresting, depending on your interpretation.
Also, as a non-lawyer, this stunt requires talking out of both sides of one's mouth. They necessarily assert that they have the authority to speak on behalf of the machine listed as the inventor in order to assign ownership of the patent, so why not just assert oneself as the inventor?
Re: South Africa issues world’s first patent listing AI as inventor
#20I don't know about you, but for me this feels like the gates of hell opening for patent trolls. AI can produce thousands of patents in a single day. As always patent trolls make no money from patents, but from the bureaucratic process. So a schema like this that allows virtually unlimited patents to be created will increase even more trolls misbehavior
Patents already have quite a big fee, but perhaps it should be made larger to prevent this kind of abuse. If the large fee prevents inventors, then perhaps some scheme along the lines of 'The fee is $50 for the first 5 inventions, then $100k per patent after that" might be suitable.