OTOH if you need follow-mode, aren't your functions too long?
Probably, but sometimes you have to work on other peoples's code. The worst for me was a 312 line function, which nearly caused me to quit.
Emacs follow-mode
31–40 of 52 posts
Re: Emacs follow-mode
#32Re: Emacs follow-mode
#33Re: Emacs follow-mode
#34OTOH if you need follow-mode, aren't your functions too long?
Re: Emacs follow-mode
#35Re: Emacs follow-mode
#36Re: Emacs follow-mode
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
How old are you current config files?
Oh, probably started them 10-15 years ago. Hard to say. I started around 1978 or so with Emacs on ITS (MIT-AI lab Incompatible Timesharing System), which was built in TECO. So those files wouldn't be very useful. ;-) Then moved to TOPS-20 Emacs in 1979-1980, then to Unix Emacs (Gosmacs) for a while in the early 80's, then, finally to the One True Emacs (Gnu Emacs) in the mid-80's on Sun workstations. I don't highly c…
* A 3 key-combo for "undo", a very frequent operation
* A 3 key-combo for switching between windows
* A 3 key-combo for switching between buffers
Very frequent operations should get assigned to short key combos, even 2 is almost too long, IMO.
Re: Emacs follow-mode
#38You can do that in Sublime Text as well: File -> Clone File http://www.sublimetext.com/
Will the cursor automatically swap between the buffers when you reach the edge? (e.g. buffer 1 is showing page 1 and buffer 2 is showing page 2; when you get the end of page 1, the cursor/focus switches to buffer 2, rather than it just being two independently scrolling views into the same file)
Re: Emacs follow-mode
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oh, probably started them 10-15 years ago. Hard to say. I started around 1978 or so with Emacs on ITS (MIT-AI lab Incompatible Timesharing System), which was built in TECO. So those files wouldn't be very useful. ;-) Then moved to TOPS-20 Emacs in 1979-1980, then to Unix Emacs (Gosmacs) for a while in the early 80's, then, finally to the One True Emacs (Gnu Emacs) in the mid-80's on Sun workstations. I don't highly c…
Don't you find emacs's vanilla key bindings highly inefficient? A few examples: * A 3 key-combo for "undo", a very frequent operation * A 3 key-combo for switching between windows * A 3 key-combo for switching between buffers Very frequent operations should get assigned to short key combos, even 2 is almost too long, IMO.
Re: Emacs follow-mode
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oh, probably started them 10-15 years ago. Hard to say. I started around 1978 or so with Emacs on ITS (MIT-AI lab Incompatible Timesharing System), which was built in TECO. So those files wouldn't be very useful. ;-) Then moved to TOPS-20 Emacs in 1979-1980, then to Unix Emacs (Gosmacs) for a while in the early 80's, then, finally to the One True Emacs (Gnu Emacs) in the mid-80's on Sun workstations. I don't highly c…
Don't you find emacs's vanilla key bindings highly inefficient? A few examples: * A 3 key-combo for "undo", a very frequent operation * A 3 key-combo for switching between windows * A 3 key-combo for switching between buffers Very frequent operations should get assigned to short key combos, even 2 is almost too long, IMO.