Live data from Hacker News

Please Bring Back Our Downvotes: Society Desperately Needs It

theapeiron.co.uk

251–260 of 553 posts

Re: Please Bring Back Our Downvotes: Society Desperately Needs It

#251
post #89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It sounds like you have a lot more fear and assumption than experience here. In reality, crazy unfair downvote bombing is not even close to the norm here in my ~decade of experience. What makes you certain that someone with multiple accounts has downvoted you? Are you sure you weren’t just wrong and didn’t know it? I’ve been wrong in good faith and gotten fairly downvoted for it far, far more often than I’ve been unf…

Look, for what it's worth I agree. In my experience, HN is welcoming of my viewpoints. My karma is over 9000, so I'm not worried if a few comments get downvoted. But that still doesn't invalidate what GP was saying. They perceive a difficulty in contributing to the conversation because they're afraid of being downvoted. You're telling them not to worry and that they'll be fine ... but it's still a legitimate concern…

Fewer people participating is the goal.

Re: Please Bring Back Our Downvotes: Society Desperately Needs It

#252
I would like to see justified downvoting implemented instead. For example users should be able to counter-argument (as in a different reply mode) a post/comment, in that case If the counter-argument gets more upvotes than the parent post/comment then the parent comment should start greying out like it does here. Of course this doesn't even try to fix sybil attacks but I still would prefer it.

Re: Please Bring Back Our Downvotes: Society Desperately Needs It

#253

I've been in academia for awhile, I'm used to getting serious criticism. I'm a man, my whole life I've been told to toughen up. There's really almost nothing you can say to me that is going to hurt me. I really mean it. But downvotes? I pretty much won't post on HN or Reddit because of them (and the culture associated with it). I've got no problem being wrong, but when I spend a significant amount of time trying to r…

> it scares me that such malicious and petty people might have power

How do we get from "I am being downvoted" to "malicious and petty people"? That looks like an issue. You said you have no problem being wrong, twice, but immediately assume anyone who downvotes your comment is malicious, when it could be a signal that your comment is just not hitting the right notes.

Re: Please Bring Back Our Downvotes: Society Desperately Needs It

#254

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> TFA does some handwaving about how it'll save democracy, but it's a crock of shit. All it does is make fewer people participate. crazy_horse tried to tell you that. The solution to saving democracy isn't reducing participation. I don't see that this follows. Limiting participation is not just compatible with democratic systems, it's crucial. Democracy-the-system (the thing being "saved") has long built in safeguard…

Imagine thinking your comments are so influential that a mere mention from you will cause a massive influx of crass HN-ers into your beloved subreddits.

Please be generous with your comments. You don’t have to be crass to ‘ruin a place’. I’ve seen it happen just from sheer numbers. Even if the influx measurably improves the signal to noise ratio, just having more signal can make a place exhausting to participate in. Not wanting to risk any advertisement can be a very prudent thing to do.

Re: Please Bring Back Our Downvotes: Society Desperately Needs It

#255

I've been in academia for awhile, I'm used to getting serious criticism. I'm a man, my whole life I've been told to toughen up. There's really almost nothing you can say to me that is going to hurt me. I really mean it. But downvotes? I pretty much won't post on HN or Reddit because of them (and the culture associated with it). I've got no problem being wrong, but when I spend a significant amount of time trying to r…

I don't think downvotes are the problem. I think the problem largely comes from the echo-chamberization of platforms. The people who would normally upvote your honest good faith against the grain take are no longer on the platform, because the reigning ideology pushed them out. That doesn't mean you are necessarily ideologically aligned with these people, reality is much more nuanced then black and white.

> I don't think downvotes are the problem. > I think the problem largely comes from the echo-chamberization of platforms

Echo-chamberization is a result of downvoting. When comments close to the borders of Overton window are downvotes, Overtone windows narrows over time.

Re: Please Bring Back Our Downvotes: Society Desperately Needs It

#256

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ideological issues get people to use downvote. Technical discourse is more civilized, upvotes are more likely than downvotes.

I agree, as long as you realize that vim/emacs, static/dynamic, frontend/backend, etc., are all Ideological issues, and not technical ones. :-) ...and jokes are generally not treated well either, unless it's Friday.

This isn't my experience. I occasionally make pretty strong statements about traditionally polarizing technical topics, and I find that people are a lot more likely to respect differing opinions than when talking about, eg, urban planning or politics.

Re: Please Bring Back Our Downvotes: Society Desperately Needs It

#257
post #56

I think Americans don't give enough attention to the bi-party system as an important cause for the current political divide, and increasingly, civil divide. My hypothesis is that a two-party system creates the divide because it encourages such a powerful "us vs them" feeling. I've never seen such disdain or hatred towards people on the other side of the political spectrum as in the US. I'm from continental Europe and…

> a two-party system creates the divide because it encourages such a powerful "us vs them" feeling I agree, but that's just the punch-and-judy show. The real disaffection stems from seeing how the incentives of politicians are reliably not aligned with their nominal constituents. We have legal precedent establishing money as speech, and a steep hill to climb for any third party to win the prerogatives which the two m…

Personally, I agree both parties are severely problematic, don't feel they're equally problematic.

I vote for third party candidates with policy I actually agree with when it isn't going to negatively affect me or others when they inevitably lose.

The sad reality is that FPTP makes strategic voting necessary if you want to have any kind of power. In addition to the issues you mentioned we need score or ranked choice voting so we can begin a transition towards actual accountibility, and hopefully eventually a more diverse set of parties.

Voting for a third party candidate is effectively throwing your vote away in a protest no one will ever hear in a FPTP system.

Re: Please Bring Back Our Downvotes: Society Desperately Needs It

#258

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Surprisingly many topics are political [1], and an answer the very right-wing libertarian consensus here disagrees with will absolutely be voted all the way down. [1] Often, the assertion "this topic is not or should not be political" is political . Because politics is how we organize society on a large scale and saying things should be exempt from that, guess what, is a political opinion.

Dunno, I'm pretty sure I've seen calls to break up or even nationalize Google and similar sentiments at the top quite a lot. That doesn't strike me as particularly right-wing?

The groupthink here isn't straight party-line, but it does have a lean.

Re: Please Bring Back Our Downvotes: Society Desperately Needs It

#259

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> TFA does some handwaving about how it'll save democracy, but it's a crock of shit. All it does is make fewer people participate. crazy_horse tried to tell you that. The solution to saving democracy isn't reducing participation. I don't see that this follows. Limiting participation is not just compatible with democratic systems, it's crucial. Democracy-the-system (the thing being "saved") has long built in safeguard…

Imagine thinking your comments are so influential that a mere mention from you will cause a massive influx of crass HN-ers into your beloved subreddits.

Lol, good one. I think it's a holdover from when the forum was a lot tinier, and discussion (especially on the topics it focused on) was a lot more suppressed in most other internet fora. While I don't understand your assumption that "influence" is required to spread awareness, you're probably right that the impulse is anachronistic now.

OTOH, clearly you read this comment, and if even one person like you was prevented from ending up on that forum, it's worth it 1000x over.

Re: Please Bring Back Our Downvotes: Society Desperately Needs It

#260
post #89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It sounds like you have a lot more fear and assumption than experience here. In reality, crazy unfair downvote bombing is not even close to the norm here in my ~decade of experience. What makes you certain that someone with multiple accounts has downvoted you? Are you sure you weren’t just wrong and didn’t know it? I’ve been wrong in good faith and gotten fairly downvoted for it far, far more often than I’ve been unf…

Ideological issues get people to use downvote. Technical discourse is more civilized, upvotes are more likely than downvotes.

Weird. Saying the same thing a few comments down earned me several down votes: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27983945
Post reply on HN