Live data from Hacker News

TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

101–110 of 197 posts

Re: TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability

#101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But their supply is constantly expanding and demand is following right up. They have 0 ads and yet everyone knows about Tesla.

Elon is one giant ad, and he has equity. Just because its not defined as traditional advertising, doesnt mean they dont promote the brand. They have physical car showrooms with large tesla logos. They litterally spent millions to put a tesla in space...

This was my first thought. Elon is constantly in the news or doing some memorable stunt. Tesla absolutely advertises it's just through Elon.

Re: TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability

#102
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> And for these reasons hard if not impossible to measure or control for confounders Are you saying that you don't know if long term brand advertisement works?

Absolutely not. It’s hard for me to tell how much of an effect exercising will have on my lifespan. Will it add 4.5 years? 10 years? But I know that exercising daily will most likely have a positive effect.

[deleted]

Re: TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability

#103
post #31
post #27

There is a fundamental misunderstanding (intentional or not) with these types of studies and claims. Limited-time promotions, e.g. a 10% off sale, work on short timescales that are easily measured. You can easily say what the ROI is of an advertised promotion, and it is often positive. (Side note, these promotions have a more-difficult-to-measure detrimental effect on your long-term profitability, closely related to…

> Source: Been on the leading edge of marketing and advertising for over 12 years Would you say that might be a source of bias? Look at SpaceX and Tesla. They barely advertise and have huge brand recognition. I'd buy Sennheiser over Beats. Krispy Kreme over Dunkin. Costco. My partner loves Zara. I don't have a high opinion of brands that advertise.

> They barely advertise and have huge brand recognition.

The show rooms they have at most higher end shopping malls are definitely an advertisement. I'm with you on Sennheiser though.

Re: TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability

#104
post #27

There is a fundamental misunderstanding (intentional or not) with these types of studies and claims. Limited-time promotions, e.g. a 10% off sale, work on short timescales that are easily measured. You can easily say what the ROI is of an advertised promotion, and it is often positive. (Side note, these promotions have a more-difficult-to-measure detrimental effect on your long-term profitability, closely related to…

And this is the best argument to bring back old school banner ads that were just an image without any third party js, or tracking. Advertisements don't have to work NOW they have to work eventually.

At least it's the best argument from the advertisers side.

Re: TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability

#105
post #27

There is a fundamental misunderstanding (intentional or not) with these types of studies and claims. Limited-time promotions, e.g. a 10% off sale, work on short timescales that are easily measured. You can easily say what the ROI is of an advertised promotion, and it is often positive. (Side note, these promotions have a more-difficult-to-measure detrimental effect on your long-term profitability, closely related to…

> is to add PENNIES (not dollars) to their sales every day

How much growth has Coca-Cola seen on their specific "Coke" line of products? How many people who don't already drink Coke, Coke Zero, or Diet Coke are going to be influenced by a (probably very expensive) TV advertisement reminding them that Coke as a brand of sugary drink exists?

I feel like if they ever wanted to save millions and millions of dollars, they could just stop advertising.

Something something Sriracha

Re: TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability

#106
post #11
post #2

TV ads. Where you can't measure response rate directly.

Also where "modern" "smart" platforms decide it's acceptable to chop up a video into a dozen slices and insert the same. exact. ad. in between each segment, causing half the viewers to swear off that brand for life?

Similarly, the only game I play on my phone is a card game, and ever since I visited my company's website to check on something, our Google ad is shown between hands almost 90% of the time. I never click on it, so you'd think they'd stop showing it after the 500th time (it's been weeks since I visited the website). Is that just a ploy by Google to overcharge us for advertising?

Re: TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability

#107
post #60
post #27

There is a fundamental misunderstanding (intentional or not) with these types of studies and claims. Limited-time promotions, e.g. a 10% off sale, work on short timescales that are easily measured. You can easily say what the ROI is of an advertised promotion, and it is often positive. (Side note, these promotions have a more-difficult-to-measure detrimental effect on your long-term profitability, closely related to…

>Brand advertising, in contrast, works on a spread-out scale of years or decades...The actual effect that a brand advertisement has, is to add PENNIES (not dollars) to their sales every day, for the next 100 YEARS. It's a long-term investment. And for these reasons hard if not impossible to measure or control for confounders - but that doesn't mean it doesn't work!! Car brands are the obvious example of brand adverti…

> Car brands are the obvious example of brand advertising.

Car commercials crack me up. Nissan is running commercials lately in the US on how dynamic, sporty, and fun to drive reckless/fast their cars are on TV.

Re: TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability

#108
post #27

There is a fundamental misunderstanding (intentional or not) with these types of studies and claims. Limited-time promotions, e.g. a 10% off sale, work on short timescales that are easily measured. You can easily say what the ROI is of an advertised promotion, and it is often positive. (Side note, these promotions have a more-difficult-to-measure detrimental effect on your long-term profitability, closely related to…

I agree with you on large national/international brands; however most of the brands that I see on cable TV in the U.S. aren't similar to Coca Cola. They are a fitness device that I have never heard of. They are a dry good that I didn't know existed. I would love to provide an example, but I can't remember any of those brands.

The study cited by the OP has an interesting appendix [0]. It shows the depths they went to in order to conduct the study. The level of ads are also dissected into national, regional, and local ads. If you look at the final table in the study which shows all the categories of brands examined, I would challenge anyone to remember a brand or product they saw on TV related to many of them. Dough products? Eggs?

Maybe I have seen an add for a paper product (top category of advertising), but I can't remember who that would be. Bounty... maybe?

[0] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/downloadSupplement?do...

Re: TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability

#109
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Brand advertising, in contrast, works on a spread-out scale of years or decades...The actual effect that a brand advertisement has, is to add PENNIES (not dollars) to their sales every day, for the next 100 YEARS. It's a long-term investment. And for these reasons hard if not impossible to measure or control for confounders - but that doesn't mean it doesn't work!! Car brands are the obvious example of brand adverti…

And yet the most valuable car company in the world (for whatever that's worth) spends 0 on advertising and sells everything they can produce.

The number of companies who could drop their advertising to $0 yesterday and still significantly outsell Tesla can not be counted with my hands.

Re: TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability

#110
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But their supply is constantly expanding and demand is following right up. They have 0 ads and yet everyone knows about Tesla.

What is your point? No one is claiming that advertising is the only way to increase demand. It is simply one option to increase demand, an option that Tesla has no use for at the moment.

If the hottest company in auto is spending 0 on ads are ads really that valuable to auto industry ?
Post reply on HN