Live data from Hacker News

TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

71–80 of 197 posts

Re: TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability

#71
post #60
post #27

There is a fundamental misunderstanding (intentional or not) with these types of studies and claims. Limited-time promotions, e.g. a 10% off sale, work on short timescales that are easily measured. You can easily say what the ROI is of an advertised promotion, and it is often positive. (Side note, these promotions have a more-difficult-to-measure detrimental effect on your long-term profitability, closely related to…

>Brand advertising, in contrast, works on a spread-out scale of years or decades...The actual effect that a brand advertisement has, is to add PENNIES (not dollars) to their sales every day, for the next 100 YEARS. It's a long-term investment. And for these reasons hard if not impossible to measure or control for confounders - but that doesn't mean it doesn't work!! Car brands are the obvious example of brand adverti…

And yet the most valuable car company in the world (for whatever that's worth) spends 0 on advertising and sells everything they can produce.

Re: TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability

#72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And for these reasons hard if not impossible to measure or control for confounders - but that doesn't mean it doesn't work!! One of the ways that advertisers and marketing people stay employed is they say that the output of their effort and money spent is not quantifiable.

==One of the ways that advertisers and marketing people stay employed is they say that the output of their effort and money spent is not quantifiable.== It gets quantified as "Goodwill" any time a company is valued (acquisition, IPO, investment, etc.) or releases financial statement (it's on the balance sheet). Coca-Cola is coming up a lot in this discussion. They have Goodwill of $17.7 billion, along with additional…

I was under the impression that marketing costs fall under a cost of revenue column and goodwill is just a BS account item to account for differences in money spent and 'market value' during m&a.

See https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/goodwill.asp

Re: TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability

#73
post #27

There is a fundamental misunderstanding (intentional or not) with these types of studies and claims. Limited-time promotions, e.g. a 10% off sale, work on short timescales that are easily measured. You can easily say what the ROI is of an advertised promotion, and it is often positive. (Side note, these promotions have a more-difficult-to-measure detrimental effect on your long-term profitability, closely related to…

And for these reasons hard if not impossible to measure or control for confounders - but that doesn't mean it doesn't work!! One of the ways that advertisers and marketing people stay employed is they say that the output of their effort and money spent is not quantifiable.

A lot of marketing activity is measured these days. A lot of the measurement ends up being through proxies that may correlate poorly with what you really care about. But you might be surprised at the amount of data associated with marketing campaigns, content marketing, events, and so forth. It's a lot more than used to be the case.

Re: TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability

#74
post #27

There is a fundamental misunderstanding (intentional or not) with these types of studies and claims. Limited-time promotions, e.g. a 10% off sale, work on short timescales that are easily measured. You can easily say what the ROI is of an advertised promotion, and it is often positive. (Side note, these promotions have a more-difficult-to-measure detrimental effect on your long-term profitability, closely related to…

Thoughts on this take about luxury branding?

https://thelastpsychiatrist.com/2011/11/luxury_branding_the_...

Re: TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability

#75
post #27

There is a fundamental misunderstanding (intentional or not) with these types of studies and claims. Limited-time promotions, e.g. a 10% off sale, work on short timescales that are easily measured. You can easily say what the ROI is of an advertised promotion, and it is often positive. (Side note, these promotions have a more-difficult-to-measure detrimental effect on your long-term profitability, closely related to…

I mean, you pretty much just validated it’s all “manufactured consent”.

Spending money to chant a specific message to tune brain chemistry, awareness, and memory, lest they die out.

Re: TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability

#76
post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

==One of the ways that advertisers and marketing people stay employed is they say that the output of their effort and money spent is not quantifiable.== It gets quantified as "Goodwill" any time a company is valued (acquisition, IPO, investment, etc.) or releases financial statement (it's on the balance sheet). Coca-Cola is coming up a lot in this discussion. They have Goodwill of $17.7 billion, along with additional…

I was under the impression that marketing costs fall under a cost of revenue column and goodwill is just a BS account item to account for differences in money spent and 'market value' during m&a. See https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/goodwill.asp

Not market value as the term is usually used. Value of assets less liabilities.

Re: TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability

#77
post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

==One of the ways that advertisers and marketing people stay employed is they say that the output of their effort and money spent is not quantifiable.== It gets quantified as "Goodwill" any time a company is valued (acquisition, IPO, investment, etc.) or releases financial statement (it's on the balance sheet). Coca-Cola is coming up a lot in this discussion. They have Goodwill of $17.7 billion, along with additional…

I was under the impression that marketing costs fall under a cost of revenue column and goodwill is just a BS account item to account for differences in money spent and 'market value' during m&a. See https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/goodwill.asp

The third sentence of your link:

"The value of a company’s brand name, solid customer base, good customer relations, good employee relations, and proprietary technology represent some reasons why goodwill exists."

The first three are directly tied to advertising and brand-building. You call it "BS" for some reason (you seem not to believe in it), but it is a real thing and we have financial methods to account for it.

Re: TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability

#78
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Brand advertising, in contrast, works on a spread-out scale of years or decades...The actual effect that a brand advertisement has, is to add PENNIES (not dollars) to their sales every day, for the next 100 YEARS. It's a long-term investment. And for these reasons hard if not impossible to measure or control for confounders - but that doesn't mean it doesn't work!! Car brands are the obvious example of brand adverti…

And yet the most valuable car company in the world (for whatever that's worth) spends 0 on advertising and sells everything they can produce.

Market cap (ie, stock price) is not a good indicator of present value, but perceived future value.

Edit: I also think TSLA isn't a car company. More like a battery company.

Re: TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability

#79
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Brand advertising, in contrast, works on a spread-out scale of years or decades...The actual effect that a brand advertisement has, is to add PENNIES (not dollars) to their sales every day, for the next 100 YEARS. It's a long-term investment. And for these reasons hard if not impossible to measure or control for confounders - but that doesn't mean it doesn't work!! Car brands are the obvious example of brand adverti…

And yet the most valuable car company in the world (for whatever that's worth) spends 0 on advertising and sells everything they can produce.

>sells everything they can produce.

That is the important part. Their production capability is limited to a level that is below current demand. It therefore doesn't make any sense for them to invest in increasing future demand until their production capability consistently exceeds the level of current demand.

Re: TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability

#80
post #79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And yet the most valuable car company in the world (for whatever that's worth) spends 0 on advertising and sells everything they can produce.

>sells everything they can produce. That is the important part. Their production capability is limited to a level that is below current demand. It therefore doesn't make any sense for them to invest in increasing future demand until their production capability consistently exceeds the level of current demand.

But their supply is constantly expanding and demand is following right up. They have 0 ads and yet everyone knows about Tesla.
Post reply on HN