Live data from Hacker News

Our security auditor is an idiot. How do I give him the information he wants?

serverfault.com

31–40 of 50 posts

Re: Our security auditor is an idiot. How do I give him the information he wants?

#32
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You think too much. Usually, the simplest explanation is also the correct one. I put my money on retarded auditor who thinks he's more clever and powerful than he is.

It never hurts to be careful. When it comes to security, defense requires closing all possible holes, while offense requires finding only one. It would be irresponsible for the employee not to at least be cautious when dealing with this auditor. It's worth taking a few minutes to call the company performing the audits and verify that the auditor is who he says he is.

IMO, that should actually be part of the process of passing a security audit. Which suggests someone who is doing an audit will ask for information that if given to him will cause you to fail the audit.

Re: Our security auditor is an idiot. How do I give him the information he wants?

#33

Everyone so far has focused on the auditor, but I want to know why the OP thinks faking the requested data is an acceptable response. That disturbs me and nobody else commented on it!

Handing over the data is certainly not an acceptable response. If it's the sort of organization that makes saying no very hard, and leaving looks impractical, this may be the best option. Sometimes all you can do with a prestigious idiot is work around him.

Re: Our security auditor is an idiot. How do I give him the information he wants?

#34
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It never hurts to be careful. When it comes to security, defense requires closing all possible holes, while offense requires finding only one. It would be irresponsible for the employee not to at least be cautious when dealing with this auditor. It's worth taking a few minutes to call the company performing the audits and verify that the auditor is who he says he is.

IMO, that should actually be part of the process of passing a security audit. Which suggests someone who is doing an audit will ask for information that if given to him will cause you to fail the audit.

Confirming that he is an auditor is insufficient. A sufficiently clever legitimate auditor might attempt social engineering attacks and fail you if they succeed.

In fact, this seems like a more effective way to sniff out plaintext password storage than saying "show me everywhere you touch passwords and how they're encrypted".

Re: Our security auditor is an idiot. How do I give him the information he wants?

#36

I flagged this. The likely explanation is that this is just a troll -- 2-day-old account, this is the only question that's been asked on it. There's no way that somebody that's been doing audits for 10 years would ask for this stuff, and there's no way any server admin would even consider providing the information. ...At least, any server admin that shouldn't be yoinked back down to making patch cables.

I agree, either this is untrue or is the product of someone very dumb. The four minutes I spent reading that were an utter waste of time.

Re: Our security auditor is an idiot. How do I give him the information he wants?

#37
post #34
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

IMO, that should actually be part of the process of passing a security audit. Which suggests someone who is doing an audit will ask for information that if given to him will cause you to fail the audit.

Confirming that he is an auditor is insufficient. A sufficiently clever legitimate auditor might attempt social engineering attacks and fail you if they succeed. In fact, this seems like a more effective way to sniff out plaintext password storage than saying "show me everywhere you touch passwords and how they're encrypted".

Sorry, if I was unclear. Confirming that he is an auditor should be a checkbox in an audit as should be limiting the information provided to an auditor. While I like your idea that it would show if they could get access to users passwords even handing out the salted password list is a bad idea.

One of the more interesting government audits I have heard about was the auditor did a basic internal audit and said he was part of physical secuity ect so people knew he was part of the audit team. He then showed up late, turning off the power supply to the building and then pointing at people who show up at the generator and saying "bang your dead" this is part of an audit etc. If they failed to call security before everyone was "dead" they where considered to have failed that part of the audit. He also attempted to get into the building without showing up on camera's ect. All of which sounds like a fun job and a good idea.

Re: Our security auditor is an idiot. How do I give him the information he wants?

#38

This is suspicious: *The "new security policies" were introduced two weeks before our audit, and the six months historical logging was not required before the policy changes. These "policies" were introduced by whom? His payment processor or by his company on the advice of this "auditor"? Or did the OP make this up? In short, I need; A way to 'fake' six months worth of password changes and make it look valid A way to…

Yes, I wondered the same thing! Aside from the legal implications, the OP seems to have some questionable ethics as well.

What's unethical about that? If politics have required him to do provide information he can't legally provide, falsifying the information seems like the only reasonable course of action.

Of course, quitting is the other out, but I do think he has a moral obligation to prevent his company from handing any of this information over to the auditor.

Re: Our security auditor is an idiot. How do I give him the information he wants?

#39
post #7
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bang on. Most likely social engineering. If this were actually an employee, they should be fired/told to fuck off.

A social engineer wouldn't try for this much data. One SSH key or password would be enough. I'm going with the fucking-retarded-auditor theory.

In the same way, shoplifters would never try to steal anything larger than something they can fit in their hand. In reality, they walk out of retail stores with objects as large as kayaks everyday -- often with the assistance of store staff. Why? Because everyone assumes no way this guy isn't legit because a bad guy would never attempt something so blatant.

Asking for everything might sound more legitimate than asking for one small thing. Perps generally go with their gut. In this case, this "auditor" shot for the moon with the wrong mark.

Post reply on HN