Live data from Hacker News

Windows Defender blocks qBittorrent

github.com

311–320 of 345 posts

Re: Windows Defender blocks qBittorrent

#311
post #222

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>* overwriting a folder deletes existing contents, rather than merging them Wait. If there truly is not a setting for this then it makes finder unusable as a file explorer and arguably the entire OS. Recursive merge is one of the most fundamental things a personal computer does.

that's the pretty standard behavior on unix. Unless the window manager goes out of its way to override it, mv'ing a folder to a place where one already exists will replace the old folder with the new one. You can go out of your way to do it manually with rsync and similar tools, of course, but by default you're moving directory pointers around, not merging trees.

> that's the pretty standard behavior on unix.

Not even slightly:

  $ mkdir 1 2
  $ touch 1/foo 1/bar 2/baz 2/quux
  $ mv -T 2 1
  mv: overwrite '1'? y
  mv: cannot move '2' to '1': Directory not empty
  $ mv --force -T 2 1
  mv: cannot move '2' to '1': Directory not empty

Re: Windows Defender blocks qBittorrent

#312

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can't transmit what you don't have. Also, fwiw "transmission" is literally the name of torrenting software. Would your argument change if that was the package being removed instead of qbittorrent? Most people use windows, windows comes with defender on by default, what's stopping the govt/some company from getting msft to remove programs and files they don't like?

> what's stopping the govt/some company from getting msft to remove programs and files they don't like? Literally the capitalistic profit motive? You know, companies generally try to avoid pissing off their customers and driving them to competitors for no good reason. If Microsoft started politically censoring users' content, that's probably the easiest thing they could do to send users away from Windows and Office o…

[deleted]

Re: Windows Defender blocks qBittorrent

#313

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That makes no sense. By that logic, what are firefighters doing but censoring homes? What are koalas but a form of eucalyptus censorship? What is locking your front door but a form of censoring burglars? No, just no. Censorship is preventing the transmission of ideas , nothing more, nothing less. Deleting a file has nothing to do with transmission, and it's being done in response to a perceived threat, not its commun…

...I'm less sure of this. If Windows Defender was deleting any file named "Animal Farm.txt", that would be a form of censorship, right? It's preventing the transmission of a piece of political literature. Now, what if it was deleting "Animal Farm - The Video Game.exe"? Now, what if it was deleting the keygen for "Animal Farm - The Video Game"? What if the activation server for that game had gone offline, and this key…

What is political censorship?

Amazon literally deleted Animal Farm off of people's Kindle readers because of copyright[1]. We are so immersed in our ideology that we don't see that copyright is ideological and political.

Would it have really been better if it was because the text of it was considered problematic?

[1]: https://www.mercurynews.com/2009/07/17/amazon-deletes-kindle...

Re: Windows Defender blocks qBittorrent

#314

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn't the stated intent of most censorship to protect from harm?

I think the distinction is pretty clear. But if it needs to be clearer: in censorship the harm is in the ideas themselves , the perspectives they spread. In prohibitions that are non-censorship, it doesn't have anything to do with ideas. You aren't locking your door to prevent the idea of burglars entering your house.

But nearly every instance of censorship is framed as non-political and purely to protect people from harm.

Re: Windows Defender blocks qBittorrent

#315
post #123
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I ditched in the middle of Windows 7, with absolutely no regrets. Valve has made tremendous inroads in gaming with Proton, along with developers releasing for Linux, there really isn't a good excuse to stay with Microsoft.

Can you watch youtube videos with hardware acceleration yet?

Yes. Download them with youtube-dl and use whatever hardware-accelerated video player you like. (Bonus: Youtube can no longer steal them out from under you at the behest of copyright trolls, because they're on your harddrive.)

Re: Windows Defender blocks qBittorrent

#316
post #93

I like how defender has been a daily thing on HN for the last week. If you want to turn this shit completely off (or actually remove it), you just need to find a way to elevate a prompt as TrustedInstaller. This is the magic spell required to carry out extremely dangerous actions, such as 'net stop windefend', or otherwise adjusting permissions so the local administrator is allowed to do administrative things again.…

> If you want to turn this shit completely off

Or just boot linux and dd a couple KB of zeroes into /media/c/Stupid Crap/windefend.exe et al.

Re: Windows Defender blocks qBittorrent

#317
post #194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I love Linux, but it's still like a glass house. One simple terminal command out of curiosity will basically force you to reinstall the OS. If you're response to that is "well you should know what you're doing before you run as sudo," all I can say is no. There is no reason why changing a DE, or installing certain software should make it nigh impossible to revert to previous changes short of being an expert or full r…

> One simple terminal command out of curiosity will basically force you to reinstall the OS. You mean like `sudo rm -rf /`? Would an equivalent command run by an admin on Windows not cause the same types of issues? Sure, there might be some files that can't be deleted while the system is running (like kernel32.dll or whatever it's called), but you'll certainly break a lot of things which you can only reasonably fix b…

I just reinstalled gnome manjaro. Not even an hour in and there is a major issue. I right clicked on the dock to get to Dash To Dock. I hit the super key at the same time an while that menu was up, I hit the settings button for the dash to dock.

My dock blew up to ~200% in size, all my icons increased in size and I can no longer enter the settings for dash to dock. It just opens up an error that is very long and I'm not willing to resolve.

This is why Linux desktop will never be taken seriously.

Re: Windows Defender blocks qBittorrent

#318
post #222

Earlier quoted context omitted.

that's the pretty standard behavior on unix. Unless the window manager goes out of its way to override it, mv'ing a folder to a place where one already exists will replace the old folder with the new one. You can go out of your way to do it manually with rsync and similar tools, of course, but by default you're moving directory pointers around, not merging trees.

> that's the pretty standard behavior on unix. Not even slightly: $ mkdir 1 2 $ touch 1/foo 1/bar 2/baz 2/quux $ mv -T 2 1 mv: overwrite '1'? y mv: cannot move '2' to '1': Directory not empty $ mv --force -T 2 1 mv: cannot move '2' to '1': Directory not empty

[deleted]

Re: Windows Defender blocks qBittorrent

#319

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can't transmit what you don't have. Also, fwiw "transmission" is literally the name of torrenting software. Would your argument change if that was the package being removed instead of qbittorrent? Most people use windows, windows comes with defender on by default, what's stopping the govt/some company from getting msft to remove programs and files they don't like?

> what's stopping the govt/some company from getting msft to remove programs and files they don't like? Literally the capitalistic profit motive? You know, companies generally try to avoid pissing off their customers and driving them to competitors for no good reason. If Microsoft started politically censoring users' content, that's probably the easiest thing they could do to send users away from Windows and Office o…

That would be nice, wouldn't it? But consumers have never held msft to such a standard so far, so I wouldn't expect it to start now. Sure a small number of people trying to spread the files will care, but if it's implemented right 99.999% of users won't even know the censor exists.

Re: Windows Defender blocks qBittorrent

#320

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is defender a ‘big daddy policing decision’? You’re welcome to disable it via group policy if you like.

Defender working this way by default is a ‘big daddy policing decision’. The default should be to not do this, and people that want it should have to enable it via Group Policy.

Are you saying that insecure by default is a good idea?

Defender enabled by default would save billions annually, and not just from businesses but also grandma who’s entire photo collection just got ransomware’d.

That big daddy policing move was the single best action taken by Microsoft.

Post reply on HN