Live data from Hacker News

Bye-bye, Bitcoin: It's time to ban cryptocurrencies

thehill.com

21–30 of 184 posts

Re: Bye-bye, Bitcoin: It's time to ban cryptocurrencies

#21
The US government should replicate the success of crypto, then ban it entirely.

  > How should governments respond? 
  > Wolf argues that central banks (e.g., the U.S. Federal 
  > Reserve) should create their own official digital 
  > currencies — central bank digital currencies (CBDC) 
  > and make cryptocurrencies illegal.
This is a solution that works.

Cryptocurrencies are borne out of a desire to be rid of governments. They're the ultimate libertarian dream of a stateless world.

Bitcoin and its ilk award the early adopters and pre-miners. They are not vehicles of economic empowerment. In fact, unsophisticated and poor investors can be ruined by moving their assets into crypto when subject to wild price swings, pump and dumps, and HFT/finance operations.

Fiat is a system of levers that betters the health of the government that mints it. They can be used to defer recessions, hedge inflations, fund infrastructure and investments, and increase the wealth of the populace. Bitcoin cannot do this. The crypto system rewards the whales, hucksters, and scammers.

Money printing also correlates with the productivity of the population, otherwise it becomes unhealthy. Taxes reap a portion of the growth and reinvest them.

USD comes with assurances. FDIC and a wealth of other measures are in place to protect individuals. If it's attacked, the government will respond.

If you lose your crypto wallet, you're screwed. No government backs BTC, so if the crypto is defeated (as nation state actors may have already done), everyone's investments crash to zero with no restitution. One crypto attack destroys the entire house of cards, and it is coming.

It's also reassuring to know that the USD is backed by a democratically elected governance.

Crypto makes hacking and cybercrime easier. It isn't untraceable like many USD transactions leveraging layering/integration and similar techniques, but it certainly doesn't require the same level of financial crime sophistication as moving money in fiat does. You don't need vast networks of physical money laundering machinery and real people in the loop.

Crypto burns energy, wastes GPU resources, drives up prices, and puts our brightest minds to the task of solving stupid and meaningless problems.

Crypto does not benefit society and the US government needs to step in with an alternative to meet the demand. Once they've become the de facto standard, then they can ban crypto.

Re: Bye-bye, Bitcoin: It's time to ban cryptocurrencies

#22
post #12

This is some of the worst junk writing I've seen on the hill. Some pretty wrong things in here, like insinuating that the only value of crypto is to criminals, and all but saying that the reason there are hackings to things like critical infrastructure is because crypto exists, which is just silly. Then it flags bitcoin as an environmental hazard, though estimates seem to be ~50-70% of BTC energy use is from renewabl…

"Then it flags bitcoin as an environmental hazard"

Well, it got that part right. Any non-POS scheme is just trading stake for something else, and buying and burning energy, no matter how green the source, is pure unnecessary waste. Skip the trading part and save the world.

Your examples of use are all good.

Re: Bye-bye, Bitcoin: It's time to ban cryptocurrencies

#23
post #6

What's interesting about this article isn't so much the contents as the biography of the author: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/expert/robert-a-manning/ - Atlantic Council, ODNI, US National Intelligence Council, US Secretary of State's staff, Council on Foreign Relations and more. I'm not sure how much attention the idea of banning cryptocurrency has had from these kind of circles before.

If you view banning cryptocurrencies as a prerequisite to CBDC, social credit scores and negative interests rates, there are volumes of policy papers from the WEF and others.

Re: Bye-bye, Bitcoin: It's time to ban cryptocurrencies

#25
post #6

What's interesting about this article isn't so much the contents as the biography of the author: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/expert/robert-a-manning/ - Atlantic Council, ODNI, US National Intelligence Council, US Secretary of State's staff, Council on Foreign Relations and more. I'm not sure how much attention the idea of banning cryptocurrency has had from these kind of circles before.

agreed, that is certainly the most noteworthy aspect. I can't say im surprised. Financial hegemony is critical for state apparatuses to maintain power. Frankly I'm more surprised it's taken them this long to begin the crusade against crypto currencies. I only expect it to ramp up further.

Re: Bye-bye, Bitcoin: It's time to ban cryptocurrencies

#26
post #12

This is some of the worst junk writing I've seen on the hill. Some pretty wrong things in here, like insinuating that the only value of crypto is to criminals, and all but saying that the reason there are hackings to things like critical infrastructure is because crypto exists, which is just silly. Then it flags bitcoin as an environmental hazard, though estimates seem to be ~50-70% of BTC energy use is from renewabl…

the people calling to ban crypto don't care about the environment, that's just an easy selling point for them to garner public support from people who normally wouldn't care. It's all about control of the financial system

Re: Bye-bye, Bitcoin: It's time to ban cryptocurrencies

#30
post #12

This is some of the worst junk writing I've seen on the hill. Some pretty wrong things in here, like insinuating that the only value of crypto is to criminals, and all but saying that the reason there are hackings to things like critical infrastructure is because crypto exists, which is just silly. Then it flags bitcoin as an environmental hazard, though estimates seem to be ~50-70% of BTC energy use is from renewabl…

the people calling to ban crypto don't care about the environment, that's just an easy selling point for them to garner public support from people who normally wouldn't care. It's all about control of the financial system

What's your opinion on carbon credits?
Post reply on HN