Earlier quoted context omitted.
Affirmative action is a shortcut, but sometimes the shortcut is the only way to make any progress. There may be a few very large issues, but also a gazillion small factors that make up systemic discrimination, both racially and against women. It is impossible for minorities to fight those individually, especially not from a position of weakness. It is more effective to counter at least a small part of the net discrim…
I'm dubious that economic standing isn't a better criteria than race in most situations where affirmative action would be desirable. Providing programs to help those in a weaker economic position more directly addresses the need, results in programs that everyone can feel that maybe they or their family might benefit from, and avoids perpetuating raced based discrimination and the resulting resentment. If when econom…
Why is the university of California dropping the SAT?
601–610 of 647 posts
Re: Why is the university of California dropping the SAT?
#602Earlier quoted context omitted.
The issue is not if testing "amplifies" racial disparity. If it is the link in the chain which makes sure the disparity is carried on, especially to bigger amplifiers like college admission, then the decision to abandon it is clear.
Even if it is also a link in the chain which makes sure the disparity is broken? You do realize that it is possible for it to be both right? The question is whether or not it helps more than it hurts and no one seems to care that it helps the students from poorer areas distinguish themselves.
Re: Why is the university of California dropping the SAT?
#603Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly. From an European perspective America's obsession with race seems absolutely idiotic. Progressive taxation and major help for poor communities and families regardless of skin colour is obviously the only sensible solution.
Racial groups are used as vote banks by the two major parties - that's all there is to it. It has nothing to with wanting to help the poor or improve social cohesion, rather the opposite. A divided society is great for the most incompetent politicians since it provides them an easy way to whip up their constituents against other groups and fish for more votes.
Re: Why is the university of California dropping the SAT?
#604Earlier quoted context omitted.
I read somewhere says "Asian American/Pacific Islander" is a totally made up term by the federal government and basically has no root in reality.
All human “races” are social constructs with no basis in reality other than the social perceptions of the group delineating them. So, yeah, that's true of API, but its just as true of, say, White.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000292970...
Yes, "Continental superpopulations" is a more accurate term but it doesn't exactly roll off the tongue...
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSmcWGV...
Re: Why is the university of California dropping the SAT?
#605I think the University of Texas has one of simplest and most egalitarian admissions policies that I have seen. If you graduate in the top 10 percent of your class, then you are guaranteed admission to all state funded universities. As a Californian I find it quite ironic that many policies in “conservative” Texas (ex. university admissions, property tax, income tax) are more much more progressive than what we have in…
Re: Why is the university of California dropping the SAT?
#606Earlier quoted context omitted.
Racial groups are used as vote banks by the two major parties - that's all there is to it. It has nothing to with wanting to help the poor or improve social cohesion, rather the opposite. A divided society is great for the most incompetent politicians since it provides them an easy way to whip up their constituents against other groups and fish for more votes.
So change FPTP to ranked choice and end the age of American extremism.
Re: Why is the university of California dropping the SAT?
#607Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which is why chosing by merit is the only fair way
There are several problems with choosing by merit. One, you have to define merit and whether it really is merit. If a rich kid scores higher because he got an expensive private tutor that taught him how to do better on the test really more meritorious than the smarter poor kid who scored lower because she didn't have said private tutor? Second, you have historically marginalized groups that lose out because their anc…
Re: Why is the university of California dropping the SAT?
#608The author doesn't spend much time arguing why the tests should be kept. This is one defense and it feels pretty weak to me: > standardized test scores say more about which applicants are likely to earn a degree and to do it in less than eight years; they also correlate strongly with students’ GPA at the university
Maybe the dumbest comment in HN history.
If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.
Re: Why is the university of California dropping the SAT?
#609Earlier quoted context omitted.
I read somewhere says "Asian American/Pacific Islander" is a totally made up term by the federal government and basically has no root in reality.
All human “races” are social constructs with no basis in reality other than the social perceptions of the group delineating them. So, yeah, that's true of API, but its just as true of, say, White.
Re: Why is the university of California dropping the SAT?
#610Earlier quoted context omitted.
The means at which we arrive upon AA is even suspect: A: We want equality, why are white people successful? B: Clearly because they went to a good college. C: Okay easy, let’s put the underprivileged into good colleges, that should fix ‘er right up. It doesn't seem like anybody is interested in solving the hard problem of why underprivileged communities aren’t producing good high school graduates. Maybe it has someth…
Exactly. From an European perspective America's obsession with race seems absolutely idiotic. Progressive taxation and major help for poor communities and families regardless of skin colour is obviously the only sensible solution.