Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why downvote without a reply? I was asking about information related to this.
Because you asked an inconvenient question that challenges some people's narrative. It shouldn't be surprise to you that not everyone on HN starts with the question "is it true" or "is it a fact", such as did Andy's report on BLM violence true?
I'm not particularly aware of why white supremacists hung out with Andy Ngo, or why Ngo hung out with white supremacists, or why Ngo made kill lists for atomwaffen, manufacturers misleading propaganda, etc.,
but pointing out that white supremacists have a token minority friend or collude with someone who is serving their interests isn't really all that "challenging".