Earlier quoted context omitted.
Almost certainly has been edited? Now I wonder what the original post was.
Nah. Wasn't edited, but it was definitely a slap at me, personally. I touched a nerve, and was reprimanded. It was not a "fun" response, and it made me realize that I had caused offense. Teh Internets tubes are a difficult landscape to navigate. It's almost impossible to write stuff without causing some offense. Some folks take that as an admonition to never write anything fun. Others (like me) learn to apologize. I'…
93% of Paint Splatters Are Valid Perl Programs (2019)
61–70 of 170 posts
Re: 93% of Paint Splatters Are Valid Perl Programs (2019)
#62Some of them are not even paint:
https://www.mcmillen.dev/sigbovik/splatters/646f93a2d62ad819...
Re: 93% of Paint Splatters Are Valid Perl Programs (2019)
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
For Perl use const name => value; Though ... I'm not sure why you'd need a "set" constant, as constants should be immutable, and set once ...
Nitpick: use constant name => value; Albeit `Const::Fast` might be considered preferable for several reasons (deeply readonly structures, variables which you can interpolate rather than barewords, etc).
use constant true => (1==1);
use constant false=> (1==0);
in many of my codes. It lets me use them as barewords, and makes the logic it appears in, saner. But this is a style/taste thing.Re: 93% of Paint Splatters Are Valid Perl Programs (2019)
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
Almost certainly has been edited? Now I wonder what the original post was.
Nah. Wasn't edited, but it was definitely a slap at me, personally. I touched a nerve, and was reprimanded. It was not a "fun" response, and it made me realize that I had caused offense. Teh Internets tubes are a difficult landscape to navigate. It's almost impossible to write stuff without causing some offense. Some folks take that as an admonition to never write anything fun. Others (like me) learn to apologize. I'…
Re: 93% of Paint Splatters Are Valid Perl Programs (2019)
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
Don't take attacks on a tool you like as an attack on you. This is rarely ever the intention, and I'm 100% certain wasn't the intention of the poster here. The tools you use shouldn't be your identity. Chill.
One person’s tool is another person’s livelihood, the corner stone of their professional experience, and the basis by which other people will (apparently) judge their technical expertise
I write software for Apple systems. It’s modern, high-quality code, but it’s for Apple.
There are people that have never met me, and have never had any prior interactions with me, that hate (and that’s not hyperbole) me; simply because of that one fact.
I’m constantly reading stuff about Apple, and people that use/like/support/develop for Apple, that is intentionally insulting and demeaning.
I should know better, and wish you nothing but the best. Perl is a language easy to learn, and difficult to master.
You have my sincere respect.
Re: 93% of Paint Splatters Are Valid Perl Programs (2019)
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
One person’s tool is another person’s livelihood, the corner stone of their professional experience, and the basis by which other people will (apparently) judge their technical expertise
Exactly. I feel your pain. I write software for Apple systems. It’s modern, high-quality code, but it’s for Apple. There are people that have never met me, and have never had any prior interactions with me, that hate (and that’s not hyperbole) me; simply because of that one fact. I’m constantly reading stuff about Apple, and people that use/like/support/develop for Apple, that is intentionally insulting and demeaning…
Re: 93% of Paint Splatters Are Valid Perl Programs (2019)
#67Sometimes I forget how insane Perl was before `use strict;` became commonplace.
Re: 93% of Paint Splatters Are Valid Perl Programs (2019)
#68Re: 93% of Paint Splatters Are Valid Perl Programs (2019)
#69That's a fun read. I once wrote an entire CMS in Perl. I still wake up, screaming, sometimes. [UPDATE] It appears as if my flippant remark caused upset. I am sincerely sorry that this was the case. No offense was meant. @peteretep, you have my sincere apology. It was a flippant remark. At the time I wrote it (mid-1990s), Perl was the best way to write portable server-side code. I took the time to learn it, and got fa…
I once wrote a vital satellite maneuver orchestration software, which had to parse various files and call models. Simultaneously the scariest and proudest moment in my career, but the alternative was Fortran or C.
Re: 93% of Paint Splatters Are Valid Perl Programs (2019)
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nah. Wasn't edited, but it was definitely a slap at me, personally. I touched a nerve, and was reprimanded. It was not a "fun" response, and it made me realize that I had caused offense. Teh Internets tubes are a difficult landscape to navigate. It's almost impossible to write stuff without causing some offense. Some folks take that as an admonition to never write anything fun. Others (like me) learn to apologize. I'…
I don't see any need to apologise for what's clearly meant as a lighthearted joke. Just don't complain when someone comes up with a clever comeback :)
It's cool.