Live data from Hacker News

93% of Paint Splatters Are Valid Perl Programs (2019)

mcmillen.dev

1–10 of 170 posts

Re: 93% of Paint Splatters Are Valid Perl Programs (2019)

#5
That's a fun read.

I once wrote an entire CMS in Perl.

I still wake up, screaming, sometimes.

[UPDATE] It appears as if my flippant remark caused upset. I am sincerely sorry that this was the case. No offense was meant.

@peteretep, you have my sincere apology. It was a flippant remark. At the time I wrote it (mid-1990s), Perl was the best way to write portable server-side code. I took the time to learn it, and got fairly good at it. Since then, I have found my muse in other languages, but I sincerely did not want to give offense. I doubt that deleting the comment would help.

Re: 93% of Paint Splatters Are Valid Perl Programs (2019)

#6

That's a fun read. I once wrote an entire CMS in Perl. I still wake up, screaming, sometimes. [UPDATE] It appears as if my flippant remark caused upset. I am sincerely sorry that this was the case. No offense was meant. @peteretep, you have my sincere apology. It was a flippant remark. At the time I wrote it (mid-1990s), Perl was the best way to write portable server-side code. I took the time to learn it, and got fa…

I’m sorry the code you produced made you so unhappy

EDIT: verb tense changed

Re: 93% of Paint Splatters Are Valid Perl Programs (2019)

#7

That's a fun read. I once wrote an entire CMS in Perl. I still wake up, screaming, sometimes. [UPDATE] It appears as if my flippant remark caused upset. I am sincerely sorry that this was the case. No offense was meant. @peteretep, you have my sincere apology. It was a flippant remark. At the time I wrote it (mid-1990s), Perl was the best way to write portable server-side code. I took the time to learn it, and got fa…

I’m sorry the code you produced made you so unhappy EDIT: verb tense changed

Any particular reason for the insult? I don't recall saying anything bad to you.

Re: 93% of Paint Splatters Are Valid Perl Programs (2019)

#8
This is obviously just a bit of fun, but looking at the output examples, I think the OCR used may be flawed in that it's heavily optimised to produce characters used in natural language (alpha & spaces) rather than to produce e.g. operators common in code. The number of "special characters" output is extremely small. This will bias it heavily toward producing identifiers, which will be valid in most common programming languages.
Post reply on HN