How Bell’s Theorem proved ‘spooky action at a distance’ is real

If the Universe were {analogy} is {real thing} related to {analogous thing}?

It is not about state, that you do not know, but state that is not yet there.

When one particle's state decomposes from superposition of states to a single state, given the assumption of quantum theory, it also affects the state of particle that is physically separated from the particle. That is the spookiness.

If we assume that the quantum particles are always in superposition of states, the question is how can one particle's observation can affect another particle at distance.

If you take out, indeterminate state assumption, then it is indeed missing the point of 'spooky action at distance'.

This is how quantum teleportation works.

Alice and Bob have entangled qubits A and B, and also Alice has a qubit C with some state that she wants to send to Bob , and Bob has some other Qubit D. To do this, Alice does some operations between qubits A and C, which includes a measurement. Alice then sends the classical information which is the result of the measurement to Bob. Bob then does some operations with the qubits B and D, where the operations he does are chosen based on the classical information signal he received from Alice. Iirc these observations include making a measurement. As a result, the qubit D is now in the state that the qubit C was in originally. (Alice no longer has access to the state that C was in.) So, in a sense, the state teleported from C to D, using the combination of the entangled A and B, along with sending some classical information. (The classical information sent is random, and to anyone snooping on the message sent, gives them no useful information, because they don’t have Bob’s qubit B to use it with.)

Nature's internals have no mind. They are overwhelmed by the mighty surroundings and always redlining, pushing themselves to the limit. Need an electron? Nature looks all around, not just the nearest bonded atom. That's magnetism.

Nature also takes the easiest path. Using it's own internals as a medium of interaction makes things easier. That's electromagnetic radiation.

We're dealing with a vast ocean of the medium of spacetime, not little building blocks of matter. In terms of (space + relative clocks) EM radiation travelling through empty space has internals of it's own. Electricity will repel or attract the entire thing. No further electromagnetism with that empty space itself. But magnetism, it gets to interact again, take an easier route using it's own internals as the medium of interaction. If you want to entangle an electron, make it so interacting with the internals of one interacts with another.

To exist, something has to give some resistance to surrounding interactions. If it happened immediately, it's just the surroundings. That's how we get the speed of light and the discrete nature of light frequencies. Besides electromagnetism, there's other interactions. Mass, as in nuclear decay, or triple pole "color" charge. Simulations and holograms mean that resistance to interaction will be much more simpler that the internals. Black holes do this. They're just one big 2D dot. Things that fall into them are crunched up on the surface.

Bell's Theorem is like measuring from the inside of a spinning coin that's growing, and stopping it. That's where Bell's Theorem, and the speed of light has more to gain. Why fight it? It's awesome. I think of plasma applications of the sun. That star orbits a black hole which can and does zap electrons into existence from empty space by crunching up a positron of a pair. What if we get good enough at that things stop looking like electrons but look like distant stars? Would that be a drive that warps the space time around our solar system, and suddenly the universe is much more smaller.