Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Should I Get a House? a better rent vs. buy calculator

shouldigetahouse.com

281–290 of 424 posts

Re: Show HN: Should I Get a House? a better rent vs. buy calculator

#281

These calculators don't reflect the reality/absurdity of the current economy. Anecdotal, but I bought a house in eastern California last year for $600k, now Zillow says it's worth $835k. Also, I'll unlikely ever be able to afford a house in the Bay Area, even though I make $220k/year at a company there. Still don't know what I'll do if my employer makes us return to the SF office in a few months. Relatedly, a ~70 yea…

If you had a significant other with a similar upper middle class wage, e.g., $220k * 2 = $440k you could probably swing it with more breathing room. You are wise to avoid the burden, in the chance you technically qualify for the mortgage but barely so in the Bay Area (e.g., leaving you house poor). The fact that home affordability requires a HH income in the top 2-3% is, to put it mildly, highly concerning. It makes…

Or work remotely. One can make way above prevailing local salaries working remotely for SF Bay Area companies.

Re: Show HN: Should I Get a House? a better rent vs. buy calculator

#282

You get old enough, and you get tired of somebody else making decisions from afar that affect your day to day life with no real consequences to them. Little things like the kitchen layout being moronic and having zero drawers get old when it isn't your choice to remodel or live with it. And while it's nice to say "just move", let's not forget that moving costs a couple months rent and a massive time investment to fin…

Eh, almost no one I’ve seen has ever spent less by moving to their own home. They’ll typically end up spending at least half of what they spent as rent just on things other than the mortgage (which would typically be much higher than the rent by itself). Now of course they often would get a larger, nicer place that’s exactly what they wanted, but let’s not kid ourselves that home ownership is somehow cheaper. It neve…

It is.

Not only is our house cheaper than a decent 3 bedroom apartment, but we’ve been here about 15 years and will own the place free and clear in ~5.

Re: Show HN: Should I Get a House? a better rent vs. buy calculator

#283

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My home's mortgage + escrow payment is ~$200/mo more than the apartment I moved from. Of course there are additional costs, I now water a lawn in addition to my usual water usage, I have to factor in some savings for repairs, etc, so closer to ~$650/mo increase. But in the end I have 2.5x the square footage, a private yard/pool/grill vs. community, a two-car private garage with guaranteed electric vehicle charging, t…

Fyi if all properties increase equally in value and municipal costs remain the same, so do your taxes.

Yeah, but the taxes I pay is less than a quarter of my monthly outlay of mortgage+escrow. Even if my taxes double from my home's value doubling my monthly outlay won'd double. Meanwhile my rent will easily double, probably even more than that in the same market.

Re: Show HN: Should I Get a House? a better rent vs. buy calculator

#284

You get old enough, and you get tired of somebody else making decisions from afar that affect your day to day life with no real consequences to them. Little things like the kitchen layout being moronic and having zero drawers get old when it isn't your choice to remodel or live with it. And while it's nice to say "just move", let's not forget that moving costs a couple months rent and a massive time investment to fin…

In other words, buying vs renting shouldn't only be based on numbers/math. I own a home for 8+ years and I have probably spent shit load of money in maintenance/prop.taxes/repairs that I probably wouldn't if I was just renting but there is no way in hell I am giving up my freedom of doing whatever I want to my home (yes yes there are limits with township/HOA etc). I don't need no landlord to tell me what I can and ca…

I quite agree with this. People - often people with choices and means (money) - spend a lot of time agonizing over optimal monetary outcomes, except:

You're going to die.

The experiences you accumulate are what makes a life, as one moves through time in a one-way fashion.

No one gives a shit if you die old and efficent, unless that's the thing that made you sleep soundly at night.

I've rented and I've owned. They both have pros and cons. Now, as I get old, I like the idea of owning something where I can do whatever the hell I want, and moreoever, I can live away from humans who have parties, make noise or compete for space. Like you'd find in a rental building. I'd like to be able to build my own gym in a garage instead of timing my trips to a gym based on how crowded it is, and I'd like to buy a couch I'll use for many years to come instead of something that has to move around.

A cost-effective life is only a happy life if cost-effectiveness in and of itself makes you happy.

Re: Show HN: Should I Get a House? a better rent vs. buy calculator

#285

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If you look at the home as a long-term investment, it's almost always cheaper than renting since your mortgage stays the same, while rents almost always rise. We had our monthly house payment more than double due to hurricane insurance increases. This even tho our particular area hasn't had a landfall in 100 years & gets hit less than DC, NYC, etc.

but apartment building owners didn't see a corresponding increase?

Landlord insurance goes up but only covers the structure and costs less, while homeowners covers more perils and contents.

Re: Show HN: Should I Get a House? a better rent vs. buy calculator

#286

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Some people move (rental) apartments every 12 months. Thats very common and adds up fast even if you're not broke.

I've never lost a deposit or watched extra rent vanish by moving. I'm confused why anyone would let that happen. Maybe it's a regional thing?

> or watched extra rent vanish by moving

Oh let me list all the ways a landlord will screw you!

It depends, heavily, on lease agreement. Where I was, a lease is for a given period of time, often 12 months. (Not aligned to anything: literally $DATE_WE_SIGNED to that +12 mo.) Breaking the lease requires paying it to completion. On average, that means 6 months of rent. Now, if you did the work of finding a tenant that the landlord approved of, that new tenant could then take the apartment (and you'd be off the hook once they started renting).

Since I know many people think this: leases don't necessarily turn into month-to-months: legally, they could, but my landlord typically did not allow this to happen: at the end of the 12 month lease, they will typically raise the rent at which point the lease contract gets renewed: often you have two choices: renew for 12 months at the higher rent, or renew as a month-to-month at an even higher rent; IME, around 5%. Now you have to balance the likelihood of moving vs not: if you don't move, you'll pay 60% of a month's rent over the term of the lease for nothing. Even if you are moving, you might not be moving at your lease date exactly, so even with planning, if you degrade the lease to a month-to-month on the renewal prior to your move, there might be a few months were you're paying 5% more just 'cause.

Giving notice to quit usually requires, e.g., 30 days, so you'll be on the hook for next month's rent, too, even if you'll have moved out by then. This is hard to avoid, since otherwise you risk not having a home if you can't get the next play lined up.

Now, of course, if you're going to move, and you can plan, at all, then you do everything in your power to align these stars to minimize the cost, doing whatever is appropriate for whatever state your lease is in.

(In my case, we opted to turn the lease into a month-to-month, and paid exactly 2 months at the higher rate, or ~10% or $200 over the 12 month. That renewal weirdly also came with a 15 mo option, which was new; over that rate it cost $300 to abandon ship. Honestly, other factors dominated, like pay adjustments due to new locale, local housing costs, even just the moving costs. But it did occupy time, worry, and made logistics unnecessarily more difficult. We also had no overlap due to the magic of family and the nature of our move.)

Re: Show HN: Should I Get a House? a better rent vs. buy calculator

#287

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, I wish we had German-style "unfurnished" apartments available in the US where you can rent an apartment that's literally concrete subfloor and unpainted walls, no kitchen appliances or cabinets, etc. I guess Americans move too frequently to make this viable.

Would your landlord pay you for the improvements you make? Is seems a full interior build out could cost tens of thousands of euros. Why not just buy if you have that much free cash sitting around for a down payment? And what happens if your landlord tries to push you out?

Germany has national rent control[1][2] and leases are heritable. Leasing in Germany is much more like owning than it is in the USA.

[1] https://mietspiegeltabelle.de/

[2] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mietspiegel

Re: Show HN: Should I Get a House? a better rent vs. buy calculator

#289

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Fyi if all properties increase equally in value and municipal costs remain the same, so do your taxes.

Yeah, but the taxes I pay is less than a quarter of my monthly outlay of mortgage+escrow. Even if my taxes double from my home's value doubling my monthly outlay won'd double. Meanwhile my rent will easily double, probably even more than that in the same market.

Sorry I meant to say that if all houses double in value, and municipal costs don't change, then your taxes do not change. Just because the value goes up does not imply that taxes go up.

Re: Show HN: Should I Get a House? a better rent vs. buy calculator

#290

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I bought my house for 225k, our neighborhood is selling for 650k now. My mortgage is much more affordable than the rents that have gone up over the years to more closely reflect the 650k pricing. But damn the taxes are gonna hurt everyone here... renter or owner (as the renter you're just covering them for the owner)

Taxes are a function of municipal costs and the value of all properties. If they all go up equally in value and costs remain constant then your taxes should not increase

In theory, you are correct. In practice, in a city or area with different valuations it may vary.

For example, in my city, 70% of households rent and half of those are in the hood. Bad neighborhood valuations are essentially a factor of Section 8 prevailing rent, and many properties fall off (as they stop meeting HUD standards) and get abandoned as they decay, because slumlords.

The effect is that in a good neighborhood, your pro rata share of the levy always climbs, even without an increase in value.

Post reply on HN