Earlier quoted context omitted.
Being in a unique position of renting out properties that I own while simultaneously renting, it seems like some of this is taken a little out of proportion. My net experience is that the burden of dealing with said landlord to get something fixed or maintained is roughly similar to fixing it yourself with equal pros and cons on both sides. Consider a $150 repair for your AC going out in 95F weather, 70% humidity. La…
> Consider a $150 repair for your AC These are precisely the examples I was cursing after I bought my house. They were the ones existing homeowners always talked about. A $150 repair for the AC is nothing. The prospective homeowner needs to think about things like: "Your roof is shot." The lowest bid is $15,000. Check is due before they leave your property. "Your trees are dying." Cost of cutting them out and replaci…
In particular, the remedy to each repair is presented as “replacement”. It is my experience with most landlords that they will not “replace” anything unless they 100% absolutely must. When a roof needs to be replaced that has tenants in it, a landlord will patch the roof to avoid replacement for as many years as they can (a roof replacement is a well known item that is inspected prior to purchase) - Like the landlord, the homeowner can elect to patch the roof. A landlord will repair a water heater or AC by any means necessary, not replace it.
As a tenant, you have no say in the repair process. The likely scenario is that the landlord will patch the roof 3 times during your lease and take weeks for each repair. Leaving you to deal with weeks of water running down your walls as you wait for the landlord. (this is known from rental experience)
As a homeowner, you might elect to patch the roof. You could pay in full for replacement. You could pay in monthly installments. You could also choose to install a Tesla solar roof instead. But I don’t think your options as a homeowner will be limited to “check is due in 2 weeks”.