Why we crave internet justice
nytimes.com
Why we crave internet justice
1–10 of 55 posts
Re: Why we crave internet justice
#2Re: Why we crave internet justice
#3Re: Why we crave internet justice
#4https://archive.is/0sNA5 . Also, the title seems to be "Why we crave internet justice". The article itself doesn't have much substance.
Re: Why we crave internet justice
#5So the rule seems to be that people are awful when there is a piece of glass between them.
Re: Why we crave internet justice
#6People are awful in cars too. So the rule seems to be that people are awful when there is a piece of glass between them.
Though a cute joke, I think there is something lost by reducing it to "people can be awful anywhere".
Re: Why we crave internet justice
#7Either that, or centralization will reassert itself brutally and force a new consensus.
Re: Why we crave internet justice
#8They can be awful offline too.
One interacts with so many more people online. So even if the same proportion of people are awful in both spaces, the odds of interacting with someone like that go up online.
Re: Why we crave internet justice
#9https://archive.is/0sNA5 . Also, the title seems to be "Why we crave internet justice". The article itself doesn't have much substance.
The page title is "Roxane Gay: Why People Are So Awful Online" though.
Re: Why we crave internet justice
#10It hypothesizes that we respond to petty wrongdoers the same way we'd respond to war criminals, and that we further have been corrupted by exposure to too much bad news.