They've included 1 as not a prime. That was a fairly recent decision.
One is not a prime number. If you allow one to be a prime number, then you can no longer say that each natural number has a unique prime factorization. This makes the concept of prime numbers much more useful when one is excluded.
I don't dispute that, by definition, 1 is not prime, but I don't see how this statement would follow if we considered it prime.
Edit: it seems more like it would be that every factorization would implicitly have 1^n tacked onto it, and while that isn't exactly useful, it doesn't break the game.