Live data from Hacker News

Launch HN: Weekday (YC W21) – Hire engineers vouched for by other engineers

news.ycombinator.com

1–10 of 67 posts

Launch HN: Weekday (YC W21) – Hire engineers vouched for by other engineers

#1
Hey HN. We are Amit, Chetan, Anubhav and Hari, the cofounders of Weekday (https://www.weekday.works). We are building a recruitment platform centered around recommendations. We help companies hire engineers who are vouched for by other engineers.

Discovering top talent is challenging. It's easy to check for great credentials, but that's not the same thing as on-ground reality and achievement. It works the other way, too: someone with credentials may not be a great contributor, and screening for credentials eliminates many contributors who are.

Our company is based on the insight that great contributors tend to know other great contributors and are in a position to recommend them. We believe that a network-driven approach can help to discover high-caliber candidates.

We chanced upon this idea when we were doing our previous startup where we found it excruciatingly difficult to hire our first engineer. We tried all job boards and tech hiring marketplaces but nothing worked. We asked 50 of our friends if they knew a good engineer for us. Many said that they would recommend someone, but few actually did. We realized that it was because the friction to recommend is too high. Instead, we asked those friends to do a screen-share call and scroll their LinkedIn connections and just tell us which ones they would recommend. This ended up increasing our pipeline multifold and is what gave us the idea to productize the same approach and try to make it work for a global network.

In an attempt to productise the same approach of hiring via recommendations, we have built a Chrome extension which removes the friction of coming up with names to refer. We give people a shortlist of people to choose from (based on a matching of roles we have available and your connections’ profiles) and they can recommend anyone they like out of them. They get financial rewards if the people they recommend end up getting interviewed by companies or get hired. Our business model works on a success fee model, we take 15% of annual salary from the company’s side. We pass on a percentage of that finder’s fee to the engineer who recommended them, while also paying if any of your recommended friends get interviews (as we have seen on avg companies take 20 interviews to hire 1 person).

We have experienced that in hiring, neither a fully automated nor completely human-driven approach works. Having to interact only with software can be a dehumanizing experience. A fully human-led approach leads to a lot of recruiter spam as every recruiter in their silo tries to reach out to every possible engineer. We believe our approach of hiring based on recommendations leads to more targeted matching and gives opportunities to people who otherwise would find it difficult in an overly credential-driven job market.

We would love to get your feedback on our approach and hear about the problems you have faced while hiring, looking to switch jobs or interacting with recruiters!

Re: Launch HN: Weekday (YC W21) – Hire engineers vouched for by other engineers

#5
When I've made recommendations in the past it's usually because I understand the needs of both sides. It sounds like once I as a scout refer my top 10, you prospect them for all of your companies, not just one. Is that right? Also curious about pjam15's question about whether the people you recommend know that we were the ones that recommended them. Also, how do you know if my (or any other scout) has recommendations that are any good?

Re: Launch HN: Weekday (YC W21) – Hire engineers vouched for by other engineers

#6

How do you seed & grow the network? How do you identify and vet the engineers on whose recommendations you rely?

Great question. It is something which we ourselves asked quite a bit. Currently we don't vet the person who recommends. We leave that decision on to the companies we work with. We have found that credentials of the person who recommends ends up being important to the companies. We also score the recommender if any of their recommendations ends up getting interviewed. Wrt seeding, it's currently with a combination of personal networks and launches within niche communities. Regarding growing, we have seen that a bunch of people who are recommended end up giving recommendations as well

Re: Launch HN: Weekday (YC W21) – Hire engineers vouched for by other engineers

#9

Is there no danger of collusion among reviewers? Can negative reviews come back to haunt the reviewer? Or are users only asked for positive reviews (i.e. silence being the most negative review possible)?

Yes, there is that danger but we have not seen that happening as of yet.

Users are only asked for positive reviews

Re: Launch HN: Weekday (YC W21) – Hire engineers vouched for by other engineers

#10

When I've made recommendations in the past it's usually because I understand the needs of both sides. It sounds like once I as a scout refer my top 10, you prospect them for all of your companies, not just one. Is that right? Also curious about pjam15's question about whether the people you recommend know that we were the ones that recommended them. Also, how do you know if my (or any other scout) has recommendations…

Yeah, that's how most current recommendations work (when one understands the needs of both sides). But we feel that it puts too much friction to recommend.

"It sounds like once I as a scout refer my top 10, you prospect them for all of your companies, not just one. Is that right?" - yes

"Also curious about pjam15's question about whether the people you recommend know that we were the ones that recommended them" - you can choose to make yourself anonymous selectively. for example, for people you know very well, you could choose to have your name mentioned. for acquaintances, you could choose to be anonymous

"Also, how do you know if my (or any other scout) has recommendations that are any good?" - Well, this is a little bit tricky. We currently just pass on the information while internally maintaining a score of how many of your recommendations have received how much interest from companies and what the interview experience was.

Post reply on HN