Live data from Hacker News

Subscription Changes for Computer Backup

backblaze.com

41–50 of 100 posts

Re: Subscription Changes for Computer Backup

#41

Does anyone have experience using this to sync between a Windows PC and a Mac? I've tried using OneDrive and it's pretty bad. I basically keep it disabled until I remember, "hey I haven't synced in a while, turn it on until complete, then turn off again."

I've used Syncthing to sync between Mac, Linux and Android. They have a Windows client. It's not the most intuitive software to set up, especially on mobile where there are confusing filesystem restrictions from the OS, but once set up seems to work nicely. I don't use the versioning / read-only features, so I don't know how well it performs for sort-of-backup purposes.

Syncthing has worked for years for me without a single hitch.

Re: Subscription Changes for Computer Backup

#42
post #32

I used Backblaze B2 for a project as the store of the files. I had to switch to elsewhere once hitting production, when doing thousands of async upload requests, some would randomly 403 on me. Their customers rep solution was to handle it on my side (yeah, I know) but it was easier for me to just switch providers. I guess for other products Backblaze is good, but I wouldn't recommend their Backblaze B2 to other fello…

B2 was designed for backup storage, not being a fake hard drive. Even if it was, you would have a far better solution for dealing with latency and your data being in the clear if you would use `rclone`. Add the B2 storage backend, then a local cache to B2, then encryption to cache. You then get local performance from the cache, unlimited space from B2, and it becomes eventually consistent in the background.

Re: Subscription Changes for Computer Backup

#43
post #39
post #33

Hey, I hope there is a BackBlaze person lurking the comments. I use BackBlaze to make sporadic, one time backups. I then disconnect everything - which is just 2 mirrored drives. These drives only contain important documents. Can BackBlaze please not delete my backups if my drives are not connected for X days, even though I pay for the backups? It is very confusing to me, and actually pretty damn frustrating. To be mo…

I'm an engineer at Backblaze. We do have extended version history that you can enable to have the files held for a longer time. https://www.backblaze.com/version-history.html

[deleted]

Re: Subscription Changes for Computer Backup

#44
post #33

Hey, I hope there is a BackBlaze person lurking the comments. I use BackBlaze to make sporadic, one time backups. I then disconnect everything - which is just 2 mirrored drives. These drives only contain important documents. Can BackBlaze please not delete my backups if my drives are not connected for X days, even though I pay for the backups? It is very confusing to me, and actually pretty damn frustrating. To be mo…

Does the $2/month extra cost for "Forever Version History" add-on not solve your concern?

https://help.backblaze.com/hc/en-us/articles/360035247494

Re: Subscription Changes for Computer Backup

#45
post #8

Since this thread might attract people who know … I’m looking at getting a NAS for home backup to get my data out of cloud services. Is synology still a good option for this? I’ve read that they are starting to engage in some anti-user behaviors like restricting the types of drives that can be used with their gear.

You still should backup your NAS to the cloud per the 3-2-1 backups strategy (3 copies of data, 2 types of storage, 1 offsite copy). Synology has an app that can do that for you. If you're stashing away a lot of data on your NAS the cloud storage fees won't be too much cheaper than BackBlaze.

If backing up my synology to Backblaze what's the best practice to ensure full end to end encryption. I do not want backblaze to have any way to see my files (I'd probably be ok with filenames however)...

Re: Subscription Changes for Computer Backup

#46
post #36
post #34

Backblaze completely lost my wife's data several years ago due to a bug in their platform, then their support tried to gaslight her into thinking it was her fault. The actual issue is that their dashboard stored cached data and said files existed when they didn't, which was only discovered when trying to restore data to find it was all missing.

I know its probably not your fault, but this is a sysadmin best practice (though, if you read /r/sysadmin, you'll see they regularly don't do this either). Backups are useless unless you regularly validate them. Backups can break in many different ways, and you don't want to find out that they broke when you truly need them. This obviously increases cost/time for using a service/solution, but its good to do to hope i…

The whole value proposition of Backblaze and similar services is that I don't have to have sysadmin levels of knowledge. It just works.

If I wanted to deal with regular validation of backups and similar sysadmin tasks, I'd just run the whole thing myself.

Re: Subscription Changes for Computer Backup

#47

I had backblaze on a laptop that was stolen. The thief uploaded all of their criminal activities to my backblaze account. I was able to inform five federal agencies on their wrongdoings as a result. Thanks Backblaze for adding the forever hold feature! You helped prevent more victims of a very bad human.

How was the thief even able to login to your laptop?

Re: Subscription Changes for Computer Backup

#48
post #32

I used Backblaze B2 for a project as the store of the files. I had to switch to elsewhere once hitting production, when doing thousands of async upload requests, some would randomly 403 on me. Their customers rep solution was to handle it on my side (yeah, I know) but it was easier for me to just switch providers. I guess for other products Backblaze is good, but I wouldn't recommend their Backblaze B2 to other fello…

Their API used to frequently have a _high_ error rate, to the point my exponential backoff retry loops were giving up occasionally.

Seems to have improved a lot in the last few years though.

Re: Subscription Changes for Computer Backup

#49
post #42
post #32

I used Backblaze B2 for a project as the store of the files. I had to switch to elsewhere once hitting production, when doing thousands of async upload requests, some would randomly 403 on me. Their customers rep solution was to handle it on my side (yeah, I know) but it was easier for me to just switch providers. I guess for other products Backblaze is good, but I wouldn't recommend their Backblaze B2 to other fello…

B2 was designed for backup storage, not being a fake hard drive. Even if it was, you would have a far better solution for dealing with latency and your data being in the clear if you would use `rclone`. Add the B2 storage backend, then a local cache to B2, then encryption to cache. You then get local performance from the cache, unlimited space from B2, and it becomes eventually consistent in the background.

B2 advertises itself as an object storage suitable to applications. This can be thousands of mobile devices using an app to save photos. His use case is, IMHO, right inside what they advertise.

The cloud backup is another product.

Re: Subscription Changes for Computer Backup

#50
post #25
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's just not as easy to stop abuse on Linux, people would find a way to backup their 50TB NAS on it.

I absolutely know people who not use it in good faith. Same people that crammed many terabytes into Amazon Drive back when it was unlimited so that they could "back up their plex server".

So what is the best off-site solution for backing up a NAS in good faith? I have about 10TB of data that is "backed up" to varying degrees but no all-in-one solution right now.
Post reply on HN