Live data from Hacker News

Scenarios in which Tesla FSD Beta 9.0 fails

twitter.com

131–140 of 502 posts

Re: Scenarios in which Tesla FSD Beta 9.0 fails

#131
Some regulator somewhere will take this junk off the road with the stroke of a pen and I'll feel that much safer on the road when it happens. And we'll have Elon Musk to thank for electric cars and the self driving winter.

It's actually pretty simple: have FSD do a regular driving test. If it can pass that it's good to go, if not it fails the test and will not be allowed to control a vehicle.

Re: Scenarios in which Tesla FSD Beta 9.0 fails

#132
post #11

I don't understand how something this broken is allowed to operate on public roads. If I drove like Tesla's FSD seems to based on the videos I've seen, I'd be pulled out of my car and arrested on (well founded) suspicions of "driving while hammered." After a decade of work, it's not capable of doing much beyond "blundering around a city mostly without hitting stuff, but pay attention, because it'll try to hit the mos…

You would think that just the name "Tesla Full Self Driving Beta 9.0" would be giving people some pause here.

I thought you were making a joke but it really seems to be called "Full Self Driving Beta 9.0". It's hillarious, do they think by adding the "Beta" it makes it ok to hit stuff unless the driver intervenes instantaneously?. How are they even allowed to call it "FSD" (Full self driving) if in fact it doesn't do that at all?

Re: Scenarios in which Tesla FSD Beta 9.0 fails

#133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wait till you read the stats and see videos of what humans driving cars regularly do!

Still, an autopilot should aim to be a peer with the best drivers, not with mediocre or bad drivers.

Well if you think of this closed beta as a way for Tesla to collect data about its program's shortcomings it's easy enough to see how releasing could save lives in the long run even it is takes some in the short run. Every day sooner that a 10x better self driving car comes is hundreds of lives saved.

Re: Scenarios in which Tesla FSD Beta 9.0 fails

#134
post #11

I don't understand how something this broken is allowed to operate on public roads. If I drove like Tesla's FSD seems to based on the videos I've seen, I'd be pulled out of my car and arrested on (well founded) suspicions of "driving while hammered." After a decade of work, it's not capable of doing much beyond "blundering around a city mostly without hitting stuff, but pay attention, because it'll try to hit the mos…

The monorail video is jaw-dropping. Nine versions in, I would expect ongoing challenges with things like you mention. But continued failure to even see large, flat obstacles is no longer something that needs to be fixed – that it has persisted this long (even after killing someone as in the case of T-boning a semi trailer at highway speeds) is an indictment of the entire approach Tesla has been taking to FSD. I used…

[deleted]

Re: Scenarios in which Tesla FSD Beta 9.0 fails

#135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Still, an autopilot should aim to be a peer with the best drivers, not with mediocre or bad drivers.

It's a limited beta with the goal of discovering error cases.

In this case I'd prefer if "discovering error cases" was done without risking actual lives. Injuring someone would not be a valid way discover an error case.

Re: Scenarios in which Tesla FSD Beta 9.0 fails

#136
post #120

Many of the comments here seem a bit... unfair to me, considering that these clips were handpicked. I watched (and fast-forwarded) through a few of the original, full-length videos from which these clips were taken. The full-length videos show long drives (in some cases, hours long) almost entirely without human intervention, under conditions explicitly meant to be difficult for self-driving vehicles. One thing I rea…

The fact that it 'only' requires human intervention so rarely is still incredibly dangerous. You can't ask a human to have complete focus for hours on end when they're not making any inputs, and then require them to intervene at a moment's notice. That's not how humans work.

Also, the fact that they're distributing safety critical software to the public as a 'beta' is just insanity. How many more people need to die as a result of Autopilot?

Re: Scenarios in which Tesla FSD Beta 9.0 fails

#137
post #123

Question: Would it be awesome if FDA allowed Pharma to conduct drug-tests like this? Put a "beta-2.9" on the vial and let people try it out... Some may die, be disabled or may linger in vegetative state life-long, but it was their choice afterall and the it can argued that medicinal side-effects are very small cause of mortality and hence long-term the "public beta tests" will make drugs more effective and save more…

I think the difference is releasing self driving provides the data Tesla needs to improve it. Releasing a half baked drug doesn't help the pharma company improve it.

If you're asking whether that would be awesome if it lead to pharmaceutical innovations I think it would.

Re: Scenarios in which Tesla FSD Beta 9.0 fails

#138
post #120

Many of the comments here seem a bit... unfair to me, considering that these clips were handpicked. I watched (and fast-forwarded) through a few of the original, full-length videos from which these clips were taken. The full-length videos show long drives (in some cases, hours long) almost entirely without human intervention, under conditions explicitly meant to be difficult for self-driving vehicles. One thing I rea…

In my opinion, a self-driving car which drives me smoothly for 6 hours then drives straight into a concrete pillar without warning isn't doing "remarkably well". That should be enough to get it pulled.

Re: Scenarios in which Tesla FSD Beta 9.0 fails

#139
post #29

One of the questions I've repeatedly had regarding FSD (and Tesla's approach in particular) is the notion of memory. While a lot of these scenarios are disturbing, I've seen people wavering on lanes, exits and attempting to turn the wrong way onto one-way streets. People have memory, however. If we go through the same confusing intersection a few times, we'll learn how to deal with that specific intersection. It seem…

My thoughts exactly. I've made those mistakes myself, many times. I guess I sort of assumed that Tesla would do three things: - Record the IRL decisions of 100k drivers. - Running FSD in the background, compare FSD decisions with those IRL decisions. Forward all deltas to the mothership for further analysis. - Some kind of boid, herd behavior. If all the other cars drive around the monorail column, or going one direc…

I can see big issues in biasing a decision making algorithm too much towards average driver behaviour under past road conditions though, particularly if a lot of its existing issues are not handling novelty at all well...

Re: Scenarios in which Tesla FSD Beta 9.0 fails

#140
post #16

It appears Tesla FSD just ignores things it doesn't understand, which is really dangerous in a production vehicle.

The vehicle is production but this particular software is not, it's a private beta and not available to the general public.

I couldn't care less what version the software is as soon as the vehicle drives around in the real world. Imagine driving with "FSD" on and hitting someone because of an issue in your "Beta" software.
Post reply on HN