The Red Cross has a right to their trademark. I accept that. I don't accept that they're a good organization.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/may/25/nazis-escaped-...
It may just be a game to you, but it means the world to us
251–253 of 253 posts
Re: It may just be a game to you, but it means the world to us
#252I hate this. It's a _red cross_. What do you expect from people? Even a 2 year old can draw a red cross. Now we have to know not to use certain colored symbols because, they might upset someone. While at it, might as well ban bad math teachers who use red markers.
Re: It may just be a game to you, but it means the world to us
#253Earlier quoted context omitted.
And the law will fall on offenders with the force of ten eider feather pillows
While I like the play on words I don’t think we should be posting unsupported cynicism like this.
I think that the cynism here is fully supported.
Was anybody prosecuted by the infamous 2007 attack to an ambulance in Baghdad shown by Wikileaks, (oh, yes... Manning of course. Silly me. I almost forgot)
Was anybody jailed for the men and woman and children burnt alive by the "strictly forbidden under international laws" white phosphorus in Fallujah? noope
Were the systematic bombing of hospitals and civil buildings in Gaza, Pakistan or Syria investigated?
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/israel-gaza-hospitals-tar...
Was somebody prosecuted by what they did to Omran Daqneesh and his family?.
Or by the annexation of Crimea?
I could spent the next hour enumerating cases of war crimes written in flashing neon letters, solved with a path in the shoulder to the criminals. Is a fact that war crimes go often unpunished when commit by "the good guys".