Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ah, the Tucker defence!
Correction, the Rachel Maddow defense. You have to pick the person to use it first.
https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-karen-mcdougal-case...
> A federal judge on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit against Fox News after lawyers for the network argued that no "reasonable viewer" takes the primetime host Tucker Carlson seriously, a new court filing said.
https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/917747123/you-literally-cant-...
>Now comes the claim that you can't expect to literally believe the words that come out of Carlson's mouth. And that assertion is not coming from Carlson's critics. It's being made by a federal judge in the Southern District of New York and by Fox News's own lawyers in defending Carlson against accusations of slander. It worked, by the way.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/judge-tosses-suit-trump-affair-...
> The judge said that lawyers for Fox "persuasively" argued that "any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statements" Carlson makes, according to a court filing.