I don't like it too much. It's still based on designing for desktop first. I prefer the ones that use a mobile first approach, which is more future-proof and is supported on more devices. Also, another thing to consider is fluid-width vs fixed-width. Fluid width layouts are harder, but much more future proof. The mobile device landscape changes fast, and there are lots of sizes to design for. A fluid-width website wo…
Skeleton: A Beautiful Boilerplate for Responsive, Mobile-Friendly Development
31–36 of 36 posts
Re: Skeleton: A Beautiful Boilerplate for Responsive, Mobile-Friendly Development
#32I despise frameworks like this. They cater to a crowd that I don't believe exists. Who goes and wants to just toss together a mobile-friendly site but doesn't have the skill set to do it without a framework like this? The huge companies that do this rather write their own and the little guys generally have hackers who can write something more efficient. The simplicity of HTML and CSS make frameworks for it seem rathe…
Isn't the appeal that Skeleton and its ilk simply do the pixel-figuring for you? I similarly have the skillset to make a CSS grid, but I chose to wrap Nicole Sullivan's 20-line grid code in a gem just so I can brainlessly include grid functionality without even touching a CSS file.
It's projects like these that help expose people like me to bare-bones implementations upon which to build.
Re: Skeleton: A Beautiful Boilerplate for Responsive, Mobile-Friendly Development
#33Re: Skeleton: A Beautiful Boilerplate for Responsive, Mobile-Friendly Development
#34I despise frameworks like this. They cater to a crowd that I don't believe exists. Who goes and wants to just toss together a mobile-friendly site but doesn't have the skill set to do it without a framework like this? The huge companies that do this rather write their own and the little guys generally have hackers who can write something more efficient. The simplicity of HTML and CSS make frameworks for it seem rathe…
Re: Skeleton: A Beautiful Boilerplate for Responsive, Mobile-Friendly Development
#35How does it compare to Less? http://lessframework.com/
EDIT: I was referring to Skeleton, btw
Re: Skeleton: A Beautiful Boilerplate for Responsive, Mobile-Friendly Development
#36I don't like it too much. It's still based on designing for desktop first. I prefer the ones that use a mobile first approach, which is more future-proof and is supported on more devices. Also, another thing to consider is fluid-width vs fixed-width. Fluid width layouts are harder, but much more future proof. The mobile device landscape changes fast, and there are lots of sizes to design for. A fluid-width website wo…
320andup takes the best parts from Boilerplate, Mobile Boilerplate as well as the Less Framework for it's grid design and typography. It's fluid and mobile first. To get going with it's grid system however, is actually a pain as it's not pre-defined for you. You'll have to perform some calculations for each media query to get a proper grid going.