The Medici as Artists Saw Them
newyorker.com
The Medici as Artists Saw Them
1–10 of 22 posts
Re: The Medici as Artists Saw Them
#2Re: The Medici as Artists Saw Them
#3--Giovanni di Lorenzo de' Medici, aka Pope Leo X
Re: The Medici as Artists Saw Them
#4What is it with every modern publication about art (or anything else, really)? "Here, we're talking about art extensively. Enjoy at most two accompanying illustrations/reproductions/photos."
Re: The Medici as Artists Saw Them
#5Re: The Medici as Artists Saw Them
#6What is it with every modern publication about art (or anything else, really)? "Here, we're talking about art extensively. Enjoy at most two accompanying illustrations/reproductions/photos."
Re: The Medici as Artists Saw Them
#7Re: The Medici as Artists Saw Them
#8What is it with every modern publication about art (or anything else, really)? "Here, we're talking about art extensively. Enjoy at most two accompanying illustrations/reproductions/photos."
They want you to visit The Met and see it in person.
https://www.metmuseum.org/about-the-met/policies-and-documen...
Museums in general have recognized that digital images don't replace the museum experience—and they'd rather provide good images of the art than have people rip off poor-quality ones. Not every institution, and artist copyright remains a huge barrier, particularly for contemporary art, but a LOT of artwork photography is out there in the public domain.
Re: The Medici as Artists Saw Them
#9What is it with every modern publication about art (or anything else, really)? "Here, we're talking about art extensively. Enjoy at most two accompanying illustrations/reproductions/photos."
They want you to visit The Met and see it in person.