Ask HN:Why Github and not Bitbucket
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: Ask HN:Why Github and not Bitbucket
#2Re: Ask HN:Why Github and not Bitbucket
#31. Git, because of its source and momentum, is the more popular of the two. So when you are looking for code hosting that supports your tool bit bucket doesn't.
2. GitHub was first and seems to be better. Bit bucket has a reputation for being a cheap knock off of Git Hub for some reason.
3. I don't think you will find to many startup founders who really see a difference between the two price points, 10 bucks a month just isn't enough to worry about when bigger things like hardware costs and employee salaries dominate the list of costs.
Re: Ask HN:Why Github and not Bitbucket
#4The reasoning as far as I can tell goes something like this: 1. Git, because of its source and momentum, is the more popular of the two. So when you are looking for code hosting that supports your tool bit bucket doesn't. 2. GitHub was first and seems to be better. Bit bucket has a reputation for being a cheap knock off of Git Hub for some reason. 3. I don't think you will find to many startup founders who really see…
Re: Ask HN:Why Github and not Bitbucket
#5The reasoning as far as I can tell goes something like this: 1. Git, because of its source and momentum, is the more popular of the two. So when you are looking for code hosting that supports your tool bit bucket doesn't. 2. GitHub was first and seems to be better. Bit bucket has a reputation for being a cheap knock off of Git Hub for some reason. 3. I don't think you will find to many startup founders who really see…
The reason for this is very simple: We launched within months of each other, and we look very much alike (how many ways can you skin a DVCS hosting cat?) And then of course there was the whole pointing fingers/attempt to drag through the mud article, that was since removed.
Re: Ask HN:Why Github and not Bitbucket
#6The reasoning as far as I can tell goes something like this: 1. Git, because of its source and momentum, is the more popular of the two. So when you are looking for code hosting that supports your tool bit bucket doesn't. 2. GitHub was first and seems to be better. Bit bucket has a reputation for being a cheap knock off of Git Hub for some reason. 3. I don't think you will find to many startup founders who really see…
> 2. Bitbucket has a reputation for being a cheap knock off of GitHub for some reason. The reason for this is very simple: We launched within months of each other, and we look very much alike (how many ways can you skin a DVCS hosting cat?) And then of course there was the whole pointing fingers/attempt to drag through the mud article, that was since removed.
Re: Ask HN:Why Github and not Bitbucket
#7Some people seem to like Gitorious.org which is apparently cheaper (free?)
Clickable: http://gitorious.org/