Live data from Hacker News

Chime has been suddenly closing accounts, not returning customers’ money

propublica.org

131–140 of 144 posts

Re: Chime has been suddenly closing accounts, not returning customers’ money

#131
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Back in the banking crisis days, I applied for a mortgage modification. I’m on top of paperwork and fax like a boss, so I made sure all of our documentation was in order and submitted ahead of schedule. Regardless, the bank tried to use every trick in the book to delay. I ended up war dialing all the extensions around my contact to find someone who worked there with access to my files to push it along. Ended up succe…

>I don’t agree with the need for physical violence. Historically, we have had decent regulatory protections for customers. “When you vote, you are exercising political authority, you're using force. And force, my friends, is violence. The supreme authority from which all other authorities are derived.” Regulatory protections certainly didn't arise from the void. If you trace them back the New Deal agencies, then you…

So, saying to an insurance company that you feel has wronged you - I am registering a complaint with the state insurance commission- is equivalent to physical violence? I’m sorry but that strains credulity.

Re: Chime has been suddenly closing accounts, not returning customers’ money

#132
In the EU at least there's directive 94/19/EC[1] which I believe stipulates that deposit-guarantee schemes have to be in place in all EU countries that protect customers from losing their money in the event that a bank goes bankrupt or withholds their money. Is there something similar in the US?

[1]: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CEL...

Re: Chime has been suddenly closing accounts, not returning customers’ money

#133
post #132

In the EU at least there's directive 94/19/EC[1] which I believe stipulates that deposit-guarantee schemes have to be in place in all EU countries that protect customers from losing their money in the event that a bank goes bankrupt or withholds their money. Is there something similar in the US? [1]: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CEL...

There is fdic insurance up to $250k

Re: Chime has been suddenly closing accounts, not returning customers’ money

#134
post #132

In the EU at least there's directive 94/19/EC[1] which I believe stipulates that deposit-guarantee schemes have to be in place in all EU countries that protect customers from losing their money in the event that a bank goes bankrupt or withholds their money. Is there something similar in the US? [1]: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CEL...

There is fdic insurance up to $250k

According to Chime's website, "Chime accounts are insured up to the standard maximum deposit insurance amount of $250,000 through our partner banks, Stride Bank, N.A. or The Bancorp Bank, Members FDIC",[1] so while that doesn't help anyone who needs their money immediately it's at least a comfort I guess.

[1]: https://help.chime.com/hc/en-us/articles/224459628-Are-Chime...

Re: Chime has been suddenly closing accounts, not returning customers’ money

#135
post #104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Whereas if you write a check on your account, pass it to someone else, who passes it to their bank, who presents it to your bank, your bank wantonly dishonoring the check would result in a much larger fallout. I doubt that the law would be on your side if the bank called and told you that your account was closed, and you continued writing checks. At best that would prevent situations mentioned in the article where y…

Yes, obviously if you have received notice your account is closed, and you continue writing checks, you're on the hook for writing bad checks. The point is that any in flight checks would cause a problem for the banks, which discourages traditional banks from adopting "innovative" ideas like freezing accounts en masse based on machine learning snake oil.

>The point is that any in flight checks would cause a problem for the banks, which discourages traditional banks from adopting "innovative" ideas like freezing accounts en masse based on machine learning snake oil.

Is this what's happening here? The way I read the story it sounded like they froze the account and then the customer only noticed because her card was declined, rather than her account being frozen because she tried to use it. Even if the banks couldn't do "in flight checks" (because people use checks rather than debit cards), it doesn't prevent them from using "machine learning snake oil" to randomly close accounts.

Re: Chime has been suddenly closing accounts, not returning customers’ money

#136
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To be fair, any bank can freeze your account for any reason. You can mitigate this somewhat by having accounts with multiple banks, but even then they can all be frozen at once. The benefit of a traditional bank is at least you can show up with an ID and beg for your money. Chime does indeed market to those who aren't financially doing great, but it's a very complicated situation. Everyone should have a minimum of 3…

But if any bank could freeze these assets, where do you suggest the 3 months be stored? Bitcoin? Under your mattress?

Yes and yes?

Re: Chime has been suddenly closing accounts, not returning customers’ money

#137
post #135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, obviously if you have received notice your account is closed, and you continue writing checks, you're on the hook for writing bad checks. The point is that any in flight checks would cause a problem for the banks, which discourages traditional banks from adopting "innovative" ideas like freezing accounts en masse based on machine learning snake oil.

>The point is that any in flight checks would cause a problem for the banks, which discourages traditional banks from adopting "innovative" ideas like freezing accounts en masse based on machine learning snake oil. Is this what's happening here? The way I read the story it sounded like they froze the account and then the customer only noticed because her card was declined, rather than her account being frozen because…

I didn't say that it prevents banks from closing accounts, rather they're discouraged. If a bank really thinks an account is fraudulent, they need to stop processing checks drawn on the account. Since doing so creates fallout they have to deal with, they're incentivized to only declare an account fraudulent if they're pretty damn sure. Whereas with a totally online account, the only downside is losing that customer.

Re: Chime has been suddenly closing accounts, not returning customers’ money

#138
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> society has lost a critical social regulatory mechanism, in the form of being able to physically beat up people who repeatedly exhibit scummy behavior Wow, that's the most poorly-thought out idea I've read in recent memory. A few more seconds of consideration should be enough to come up with all the reasons this is such a terrible idea. But one that I can contribute from a slightly unusual perspective (working adja…

I don't think you're responding to an advocate for violence. I think the mere possibility of violence that comes with face-to-face interactions modifies people's behavior.

The "possibility" of violence which is known to never occur is an empty threat and will be ignored just as quickly.

Re: Chime has been suddenly closing accounts, not returning customers’ money

#139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's gone because it worked so poorly for society. Most obvious consequence: the physically-strong can get more justice than the weak. Which leads inevitably to: the physically-strong make the rules. And social regulation has failed.

I wouldn't say that it's gone because it worked so poorly. It's gone for other reasons such as technological advances shifting so much business online where this behavior is no longer possible. I don't think it worked poorly. While we didn't have a constant epidemic of customers fighting with customer service people, the possibility of it served as an effective deterrent for overly scummy behavior (from both sides ac…

This is such a confusing take on human nature.

Do you think the implied-but-never-actualized threat of physical violence is the thing that makes in-person customer service succeed?

I think it's exactly the opposite.

In-person service is typically better because communication is higher-fidelity, and people are much more empathetic when their counterpart is physically present.

When communication and empathy fail, the threat of physical violence is still not a motivator because (in my little corner of the world), there is basically no threat. The shopkeeper isn't going to jump over the counter and throttle the customer, nor vice versa. Because society built laws and norms that prevent that from being a viable solution, and guarantee that choosing that path will lead to much more serious problems.

It's entirely rational, and we don't need a vague passive-aggressive quasi-threat of a punch in the nose to make it work. No system works all the time, and there are always Poor Impulse Control people who leave the store and come back with a shotgun. But I'd argue that those extremely rare cases are further proof that the in-person "threat of physical violence" does not play a part in making customer service work well.

Re: Chime has been suddenly closing accounts, not returning customers’ money

#140
post #118

I had an fraudulent account opened in Chime with my name/info (about a year ago). I contacted support when I received some weird marketing email for this service I never signed up for. I tried to talk to their support as it was obviously fraudulent and they wanted me to send in License/Docs proving my identity. Didn't trust them with a photo copy of my license since they were obviously terrible and just froze my cred…

What could they have done better here? I'd be more concerned had they just closed the account without verifying your identity, that would be bad.

They could've sent me a confirmation link since the email was linked but the login credentials were the fraudsters (couldn't reset via email). Though that obviously has issues as well.

I'm not entirely sure, but there was no way I was going to give out sensitive information (imo) to a website that I'm not familiar with. Even at the time I was trying to get support, It felt like the company wasn't even legit.

No great answer here. Maybe escalate to a manager and have a more involved conversation.

Post reply on HN