Live data from Hacker News

The humble water heater could be the savior of our energy infrastructure woes

salon.com

101–110 of 258 posts

Re: The humble water heater could be the savior of our energy infrastructure woes

#101
post #97
post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> One big advantage is that they can also be run in reverse I don't get why this is an advantage. That's just plain old air conditioning, which is genreally considered to be a wasteful, energy guzzling luxury in colder climates. The heat pump hype is a bit puzzling to me. Here's a TreeHugger article which puts it better than I can: https://www.treehugger.com/why-are-there-so-many-fist-pumps-...

Good heat pumps aren't of the air conditioner type. Our heat pump uses two 60m deep drilled holes. Thus heat exchange happens in the ground, which is always more or less 10 degrees Celsuis. Heat exchange in the house happens through floor heating. So during a hit summer, the reverse capability just pumps the cold water through our floors (controlled for the dew point) and the warm floor water into the ground. That, c…

What sort of problems did you encounter drilling two 60m deep holes? How wide are they?

Re: The humble water heater could be the savior of our energy infrastructure woes

#102
Lots of good discussions about water heating in this thread. But it's such a tricky topic.

Tankless water heaters are pretty efficient, but when you need hot water, you briefly use huge amounts of energy. It's for this reason that they almost always use natural gas. Electric tankless heaters are a great way to cause brownouts. They're roughly the size of a microwave oven, so they can fit in pretty much any kind of dwelling.

Water heaters with tanks, on the other hand, take up huge amounts of space and require frequent (but lower) energy input. This can use heat from a variety of sources, including low quality/unrealiable heat sources like solar heat pipes.

Then there's space heating. Unless you live in a Passivhaus, keeping a comfortable indoor temperature is challenging. Central heating using hot water and radiators is the most common approach where I live. But this again relies on burning hydrocarbons. Or, increasingly, on heat pumps, which require a lot of space, are noisy, and drop in efficiency as the temperature drops.

As far as I can tell, there are no silver bullets in either space heating or water heating. If you have a really big house, a big tank is probably a good solution for hot water. But living in a really big house is horribly inefficient in its own way. So I'm guessing that's not the greener approach. Living in a smaller dwelling is more efficient. But it seems there are basically zero good ways to heat small living spaces and hot water for a family of 1-2 living in small houses.

Re: The humble water heater could be the savior of our energy infrastructure woes

#103
post #94
post #71

This is old technology, I'm surprised the US hasn't already implemented it. They have been remote-controlling water heaters in New Zealand and Australia since the 50s. Just a simple relay installed in each house that responses to extra frequencies on the power lines in the 160-1600hz range. It's called ripple control, for obvious reasons. Each home gets assigned to one of several channels in each area so they can hav…

About half of the US uses natural gas for water heating - its substantially more efficient than burning said gas (or coal) to generate electricity, then using the electricity to heat water.

Is it though? It might be cheaper in many area's but this source [1] says that the grid transmission loss is only 5%. Am I missing something that makes it a more substantial difference?

Not to mention that piping all that natural gas out to each home has to result in a certain amount of leakage and energy cost in just the pumping itself.

[1] https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=105&t=3#:~:text=Th....

Re: The humble water heater could be the savior of our energy infrastructure woes

#104
post #97
post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> One big advantage is that they can also be run in reverse I don't get why this is an advantage. That's just plain old air conditioning, which is genreally considered to be a wasteful, energy guzzling luxury in colder climates. The heat pump hype is a bit puzzling to me. Here's a TreeHugger article which puts it better than I can: https://www.treehugger.com/why-are-there-so-many-fist-pumps-...

Good heat pumps aren't of the air conditioner type. Our heat pump uses two 60m deep drilled holes. Thus heat exchange happens in the ground, which is always more or less 10 degrees Celsuis. Heat exchange in the house happens through floor heating. So during a hit summer, the reverse capability just pumps the cold water through our floors (controlled for the dew point) and the warm floor water into the ground. That, c…

> Good heat pumps aren't of the air conditioner type. Our heat pump uses two 60m deep drilled holes. Thus heat exchange happens in the ground, which is always more or less 10 degrees Celsuis.

Good point. The source and destination of heat can be air, water, or "ground source". But it's still all just the same concept as A/C units. Pump heat to one place, using less energy than what it would take to heat it using resistance heating. There is nothing special about ground source heat pumps, except that they're a pain to install in densely populated areas.

All types of heat pumps, unfortunately, often leak. Depending on the type of refrigerant they use, this can be a serious climate concern as well.

Re: The humble water heater could be the savior of our energy infrastructure woes

#105
post #103
post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

About half of the US uses natural gas for water heating - its substantially more efficient than burning said gas (or coal) to generate electricity, then using the electricity to heat water.

Is it though? It might be cheaper in many area's but this source [1] says that the grid transmission loss is only 5%. Am I missing something that makes it a more substantial difference? Not to mention that piping all that natural gas out to each home has to result in a certain amount of leakage and energy cost in just the pumping itself. [1] https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=105&t=3#:~:text=Th... .

Gas to electricity efficiency is low so you loose more then half the energy when producing electricity from gas. Using a 90 percent efficiency furnace to heat water directly with gas is the better solution.

Assuming your electricity comes from gas plants.

Re: The humble water heater could be the savior of our energy infrastructure woes

#106
post #102

Lots of good discussions about water heating in this thread. But it's such a tricky topic. Tankless water heaters are pretty efficient, but when you need hot water, you briefly use huge amounts of energy. It's for this reason that they almost always use natural gas. Electric tankless heaters are a great way to cause brownouts. They're roughly the size of a microwave oven, so they can fit in pretty much any kind of dw…

Tankless are also useless if you don't have perfect water, and even if you do you have to descale them every year. The calcium, iron, and others in your water builds up in the small copper pipes, and an acidic cleaner is required to remove it. If youve ever used a Keurig it's similar.

Propane water tanks are pretty bulletproof. Even with bad water they just truck, and require no electricity to operate, unlike some other gas appliances.

Re: The humble water heater could be the savior of our energy infrastructure woes

#107
post #96
post #79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

50kWh can cover about two to three weeks for me. Unless you use electricity for heating, you don't really need all that much.

That’s impressive. We don’t use electricity for heating (heating and warm water are powered by community heat), and need 11kWh per day on average, excluding the EV. The EV adds another 5.5kWh per day.

My main consumers are probably the fridge and the oven. I made sure to buy an efficient fridge. Other than those I usually only have a laptop or two running. The washing machine only runs once or twice a week, most of the time only at 30°C.

Re: The humble water heater could be the savior of our energy infrastructure woes

#108
Am I the only one that find this article incredibly confusing?

It starts off talking about wanting to move energy production to renewable sources. Great, I'm with you so far. A major issue with renewable energy (solar and wind) is that they're variable, not constant. This results in uneven power. The wind doesn't blow, it's cloudy or it's night time. So we need a way to convert this variable renewable energy into constant energy that's accessible around the clock. An obvious solution to the problem is to convert the renewable energy into stored potential energy. This is what pumped hydroelectric dams are all about. Use the variable energy to pump a bunch of water up behind a dam, then release it when you need a more constant supply of energy.

Great, so we've got that much figured out. The world needs a way to convert renewable energy into constant energy.

And the solution to this problem is... the distribution of more efficient water heaters.

Wat

How do more efficient water heaters in any way, shape or form help solve the renewable variable rate energy to constant energy problem? I feel like I must be missing something obvious. Are we able to somehow store energy in heat-pump based water heaters and then extract that energy to run other items in our homes? When you store energy in a heat-pump based water heater does it not need to run at night when renewable energy sources are lowest?

Can anyone explain to me what the heck this article is talking about?

I feel like I'm missing the larger picture, but I don't see how these two concepts (energy storage and appliance efficiency) are related.

Re: The humble water heater could be the savior of our energy infrastructure woes

#109

Can you also store cold cheaply? For example, to run an A/C early in the morning, and put the cold in an insulated tank of a room-temperature phase change material [0]? [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phase-change_material#Common_P...

Some drink vending machines in Japan does that. Its compressor runs mainly at night, stops or runs in lower power at noon.

Re: The humble water heater could be the savior of our energy infrastructure woes

#110
post #95
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This will be the case in the next couple of years. Wall boxes are inherently smart (that is, controllable). So as a sink, the concept works somewhat already. But most cars won't be empty all the time. Also as source the 50kWh will only be usable as an emergency backup for the owner of the vehicle and only if they have the infrastructure to consume directed current. No one will let their own battery drain for the grea…

> No one will let their own battery drain for the greater good Agreed. That’s why you‘ll get adequately paid for the energy sucked out of the battery in the evening when everybody starts cooking and energy prices on the market spike. The big problem we have right now is that we want to get rid of coal and gas, but they are currently absolutely necessary for serving peaks occurring when wind power and solar lie flat.…

Yes and add to that the ability of many of these large-battery vehicles to self-drive. For example when the owner is working during the day, the vehicle could drive to a regional charging station. This could help with the distribution component e.g. in rural areas with no power lines for the last few miles — the vehicle simply drives the power from where it’s available to where it’s needed.
Post reply on HN