70% of respondents say quality of life in San Francisco has declined
1–10 of 32 posts
Re: 70% of respondents say quality of life in San Francisco has declined
#2How are they avoiding all of the change?
Re: 70% of respondents say quality of life in San Francisco has declined
#3As a former resident, I'd be curious how the 30% who haven't had a decline in quality of life... live? How are they avoiding all of the change?
Re: 70% of respondents say quality of life in San Francisco has declined
#4As a former resident, I'd be curious how the 30% who haven't had a decline in quality of life... live? How are they avoiding all of the change?
Money
Addendum/update:
Also, this context seems to share a lot of similarities with the rise and fall of the now abandoned ghost towns that emerged during gold mining, or am I the only one making this association?
Re: 70% of respondents say quality of life in San Francisco has declined
#5As a former resident, I'd be curious how the 30% who haven't had a decline in quality of life... live? How are they avoiding all of the change?
Re: 70% of respondents say quality of life in San Francisco has declined
#6Re: 70% of respondents say quality of life in San Francisco has declined
#7As a former resident, I'd be curious how the 30% who haven't had a decline in quality of life... live? How are they avoiding all of the change?
Re: 70% of respondents say quality of life in San Francisco has declined
#8Re: 70% of respondents say quality of life in San Francisco has declined
#9Now don’t get me wrong the city is epically mismanaged and has a lot of its own problems, but the amount of chart crime going on right now (X is up YYY% since last year!) is pretty unforgivable.
Re: 70% of respondents say quality of life in San Francisco has declined
#10As a former resident, I'd be curious how the 30% who haven't had a decline in quality of life... live? How are they avoiding all of the change?