Live data from Hacker News

I do not agree with Github's use of copyrighted code as training for Copilot

thelig.ht

11–20 of 545 posts

Re: I do not agree with Github's use of copyrighted code as training for Copilot

#13
post #8

While I understand the sentiment wasn’t Copilot trained on code not only hosted on GitHub, but found all over the Internet? Which means hosting your code yourself would not prevent GitHub from using it to train Copilot. That raises an interesting question though - how do you opt out? Is there even a way to do it?

robots.txt, or a copyright notice saying the code can't be used to train AI which bots will ignore and open their corporate masters to liability.

on edit: fixed typo

Re: I do not agree with Github's use of copyrighted code as training for Copilot

#14
post #8

While I understand the sentiment wasn’t Copilot trained on code not only hosted on GitHub, but found all over the Internet? Which means hosting your code yourself would not prevent GitHub from using it to train Copilot. That raises an interesting question though - how do you opt out? Is there even a way to do it?

I'm not surprised. I imagine all images on the internet are used to train image classifiers as well. It's a shitty future, but it's the one we have.

Re: I do not agree with Github's use of copyrighted code as training for Copilot

#16

Some unknown person is trying to get some hype on “cancel github” cry. I don't give a shit about the Copilot, but I care even less about Rian Hunter and his statements.

My thoughts too

Also

>Who asked?

But you deleted that comment.

Re: I do not agree with Github's use of copyrighted code as training for Copilot

#18
post #6

Lets face, gitlab and github valuation is based on future “ai” code autogens. Brave new world

I cannot see them even throwing together a library. For example, how could they architect, let's say something like jQuery?
Post reply on HN