IBM's 18-month company-wide email system migration has been a disaster: sources
151–155 of 155 posts
Re: IBM's 18-month company-wide email system migration has been a disaster: sources
#152Re: IBM's 18-month company-wide email system migration has been a disaster: sources
#153IBM has a major Slack outage at least once a week for most of this year. I don't know really whether it's a Slack problem, or an IBM problem, or if trying to split off Kyndryl at the same time is just too much, but it's always having rolling outages.
Re: IBM's 18-month company-wide email system migration has been a disaster: sources
#154IBM-er here. yep, it's kinda a disaster, but tech savvy people can access their mail (clearing cache & cookies every few hours helps for some folks). Funny thing, IBM tried to move to Exchange for years , but it failed every time. Turns out, calendar integration (between Exchange and Verse/Notes) is tricky. Especially if you have to do it for 300000 accounts. To be frank, I haven't received any meeting invites in 3 d…
Migration from Lotus Notes is always horrible. In 2011 I worked on many migrations to Google Apps for Business (GSuite, Google for Work etc) and there was only one person in all of Google who understood Lotus Notes and could maintain the migration tool he had created.
Re: IBM's 18-month company-wide email system migration has been a disaster: sources
#155So a migration from Lotus Notes to what? It wasn't clear to me in the article.
The actual transition is said to be from servers they sold to servers they still own. But they have at least three email systems, apparently (Outlook, Notes, and something called Verse are all mentioned), and I wonder if this is part of the issue. Three email systems could be worse than any one of them?