Could someone spell out a use case for this? One that comes to mind would be validating that a mailing list doesn't have any outdated email addresses in it, but couldn't that be determined by just checking for a bounce when a message is sent to it? I tried to sign up for SiriusXM the other day, and though I could create an account with my .pro email address, I couldn't actually sign up for service with that same addr…
Check If Email Exists
141–150 of 260 posts
Re: Check If Email Exists
#142Could someone spell out a use case for this? One that comes to mind would be validating that a mailing list doesn't have any outdated email addresses in it, but couldn't that be determined by just checking for a bounce when a message is sent to it? I tried to sign up for SiriusXM the other day, and though I could create an account with my .pro email address, I couldn't actually sign up for service with that same addr…
The practice of email confirmation is still widely used, but the change in email deliverable rules has make it a pain to properly validate them.
Even if you are using a 3rd party provider like SES or mailgun, they have a email bounce limit. A considerable number of real world users give fake email address(which is even sometimes encouraged on HN) which triggers those bounce limits.
To fix it, there are paid services but they does not work very well. Fixing it yourself take a lot of engineering time, that is better spent elsewhere.
Providing an open solution to this problem (which is given in the github repo) is a double edge sword. As this gives a edge to spammers who created the problem in the first place.
Re: Check If Email Exists
#143On your site ( https://reacher.email ) it shows "Open-Source" next to the MIT logo. To any reasonable person, that means "it's licensed under the MIT license". Instead, it's licensed under the AGPL. It would be good if you changed it to remove the implication that it was MIT licensed.
Uh, what? "Open source" doesn't mean "MIT" any more than "vehicle" means "truck"…
Re: Check If Email Exists
#144Re: Check If Email Exists
#145Could someone spell out a use case for this? One that comes to mind would be validating that a mailing list doesn't have any outdated email addresses in it, but couldn't that be determined by just checking for a bounce when a message is sent to it? I tried to sign up for SiriusXM the other day, and though I could create an account with my .pro email address, I couldn't actually sign up for service with that same addr…
Re: Check If Email Exists
#146Earlier quoted context omitted.
I specifically bought a cheap .org since some companies have trouble with lesser known TLDs
I have a .red and a .me and I have never not been able to sign up.
It's nice to have but I've had quite a few headaches with it
Re: Check If Email Exists
#147Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’ve been doing the same thing for years and haven’t had any trouble except for Mailchimp. Their overly-clever validation decided mailchimp@example.com is a shared email account (it wasn’t going to be) and blocked me from using it. Their email support apologized but said they couldn’t fix the false positive, and that they hoped the email I used instead wasn’t reflective of my opinion: mailchimp-morons@example.com.
Do you have a personal set up for managing these emails and disabling the bad ones? or are you using something like 33mail? Just curious.
Re: Check If Email Exists
#148Earlier quoted context omitted.
Used to be in the same camp, before starting my own company. While the border is thin, it is clear, and there is a difference between marketing and spam.
I think you proved the point: when the spammer send spam they think they are doing marketing.
Re: Check If Email Exists
#149Now I'm slightly worried that in addition to counting me as a robot and an attacker, online services will think that my email address does not exist.
Re: Check If Email Exists
#150On your site ( https://reacher.email ) it shows "Open-Source" next to the MIT logo. To any reasonable person, that means "it's licensed under the MIT license". Instead, it's licensed under the AGPL. It would be good if you changed it to remove the implication that it was MIT licensed.