Link rot and content drift are endemic to the web
41–50 of 220 posts
Re: Link rot and content drift are endemic to the web
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
Domains, if not outright sold by the owner, should die then.
And never be possible to register ever again? I feel like most easy-to-type domains would have been permanently expended in the early days of the web.
Re: Link rot and content drift are endemic to the web
#43Re: Link rot and content drift are endemic to the web
#44Re: Link rot and content drift are endemic to the web
#45Knowing that it decays is what prompts us to try and save the bits worth saving. I don't sit in the camp that everything digital must be preserved and that it's a disaster if it isn't. I try not to fight entropy in it's many manifestations. It's a shame when content disappears but I think it's also healthy to just accept it. We tend to only frame information disappearing in a negative light because we can always imag…
Re: Link rot and content drift are endemic to the web
#46It's an Atlantic article so it's long, and several of the comments here show that people aren't actually reading the whole thing... but I did and it's worth the time. It's not only about links being dead, it's about the lack of transparency & audit when content is changed via takedown requests, it's about dead links showing up in decades-old supreme court decisions, it's about private industry's lack of incentive for…
Maybe the reason it feels impossible to stem the tide of link rot is that it's takes tremendous energy to constantly increase the entropy of a system. And that energy has opportunity cost that no one really wants to talk about. The article has the unstated assumption that eternal preservation of all writing ever is a net benefit. I think it's worth having a discussion on that point.
I suppose you meant "decrease"
Re: Link rot and content drift are endemic to the web
#47Re: Link rot and content drift are endemic to the web
#48Re: Link rot and content drift are endemic to the web
#49Visiting an old forum and all the pictures will be gone because, surprise, free image hosting doesn't make economic sense.
(Also, Twitter posts are often linked, but usually the text is copied for archival purposes.)
My experience with Wikipedia, forums such as those, and Wayback Machine and arxiv.org make me think that people will do a lot of stuff basically for free and that by building communities, you don’t need extremely clever trustless incentive systems like Blockchain or major paywalls (although granted, the forum does have something like a paywall for unverified pre-public info) or massive platforms with multi billion dollar companies in order to disseminate information, analysis, news, etc. Best practices of web forums from the 2000s (active moderation, a sense of common purpose, expectations of non-toxicness, etc), are a really good solution.
Re: Link rot and content drift are endemic to the web
#50Buddhists chuckle at the notion of permanence and go back to constructing sand mandalas