Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are many fundamental difference between standing armies and/or organized militias and violent mobs in terms of scale, martial effectiveness, negotiations, treaties and post-conflict continuation. Mobs don't win wars, they merely destroy and the rest is left to fate, often with disastrous results(see Libya as an example). Mobs can't sit at the negotiation table Mobs can't agree to treaties and enforce them Mobs…
> Mobs don't win wars, they merely destroy and the rest is left to fate You seriously can't think of any counterexamples to that? Like maybe some French (contemporary and historical), German or Russian counterexamples?
People always forget that the Russian Revolution was followed by war between the Whites and the Reds.