What mRNA is good for, and what it maybe isn’t
blogs.sciencemag.org
What mRNA is good for, and what it maybe isn’t
1–10 of 152 posts
Re: What mRNA is good for, and what it maybe isn’t
#2Re: What mRNA is good for, and what it maybe isn’t
#3Isn't that what substituting uracil by pseudouridine solves?
Re: What mRNA is good for, and what it maybe isn’t
#4Derek Lowe's articles during covid have been a huge help trying to navigate the coronavirus hellscape we have been in. It's great to see him start to talk post-covid applications of medicine as things maybe wind down a bit. Delta+ willing
Re: What mRNA is good for, and what it maybe isn’t
#5One thing that I'd like to emphasize is how unbelievably tiny mRNA therapeutics have to be. It's probably around 30 mg, and it's hard to do it more than once every few weeks, at least judging by siRNA therapeutics (which have similar immune issues).
30 mg is really tiny. It's hard to come up with a meaningful therapeutic in such a small amount of material. People have been hyping up self-replicating mRNA as a solution, but that's still in its infancy, and has its own problems regarding the "compilers"/polymerases that need to be packaged with it.
Re: What mRNA is good for, and what it maybe isn’t
#6> So if you’re going to give patients an mRNA injection and you don’t want to set off alarm bells in the innate immune system, you’re going to have to carefully engineer your sequences at the very least. Isn't that what substituting uracil by pseudouridine solves?
Re: What mRNA is good for, and what it maybe isn’t
#7https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/early-concerns-rai...
25-45% randomly modified or defective mRNA doesn't sound safe. It's a bit like machine code with random errors, isn't it?
Re: What mRNA is good for, and what it maybe isn’t
#8I am worried about the low level of intact mRNA in those vaccines, esp. as an IT guy. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/early-concerns-rai... 25-45% randomly modified or defective mRNA doesn't sound safe. It's a bit like machine code with random errors, isn't it?
Re: What mRNA is good for, and what it maybe isn’t
#9I am worried about the low level of intact mRNA in those vaccines, esp. as an IT guy. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/early-concerns-rai... 25-45% randomly modified or defective mRNA doesn't sound safe. It's a bit like machine code with random errors, isn't it?
All mRNA disappears from body in few days anyway.
Re: What mRNA is good for, and what it maybe isn’t
#10I am worried about the low level of intact mRNA in those vaccines, esp. as an IT guy. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/early-concerns-rai... 25-45% randomly modified or defective mRNA doesn't sound safe. It's a bit like machine code with random errors, isn't it?