Live data from Hacker News

New LinkedIn Data Leak Leaves 700M Users Exposed

restoreprivacy.com

131–140 of 153 posts

Re: New LinkedIn Data Leak Leaves 700M Users Exposed

#131
post #114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Check out Redact( https://redact.dev/ ).

Thanks for the tip! Miss google on the services

Sucks, but heres why no google support:

From the redact.dev FAQ page:

Why don't you support anything made by Google or Apple? At this time, we are reliant on both Google and Apple to be listed in their respective app stores. As such, we have been advised that in order to remain in good standing we should not offer support for these services.

Re: New LinkedIn Data Leak Leaves 700M Users Exposed

#132

FWIW, I've been scrubbing my social profiles. LinkedIn, Yelp, Facebook, etc. Barest of bones. Removing all connections, photos, posts, personal details. (I know the damage is already done. The aggregators never really delete anything.) Why not just out right delete my profiles? I'm squatting. To ensure they're not used as socket puppets. After a beloved coworker passed, their profile got highjacked. Ten years later,…

How do you scrub your Facebook profile? There aren’t good tools for it. Facebook itself only lets you do it one post at a time in their activity log. Their constant design changes have broken extensions that used to help you do it ( https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/social-book-post-m... )

https://redact.dev

Re: New LinkedIn Data Leak Leaves 700M Users Exposed

#133
post #68

FWIW, I've been scrubbing my social profiles. LinkedIn, Yelp, Facebook, etc. Barest of bones. Removing all connections, photos, posts, personal details. (I know the damage is already done. The aggregators never really delete anything.) Why not just out right delete my profiles? I'm squatting. To ensure they're not used as socket puppets. After a beloved coworker passed, their profile got highjacked. Ten years later,…

I’ve been doing the same. The potential downside risk of having LinkedIn/Facebook/Instagram profiles just keeps growing and growing. I’m a complete ghost on the Internet. I have Google alerts set up for my names and email addresses, and I regularly attempt to docs myself to find any leaks. I also can’t understand why anyone in the public eye doesn’t completely sanitise their social media profiles. The amount of peopl…

I was going to ask if you said "docs" as in "doxxing" [0] but then a quick Wikipedia search got me to the etymology [1] of "doxxing" which comes from "docs" as in "documents"! TIL

[0] https://www.thefreedictionary.com/doxx [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doxing#Etymology

Re: New LinkedIn Data Leak Leaves 700M Users Exposed

#134
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can set your profile to only be viewable to connections or second degree connections

You can also "hibernate" your account to disable it completely until you log in again. I just did this; my go-forward strategy will be to resurface and collect connections anytime I switch jobs, then hibernate it again when I no longer need it. That way it can serve its only real function of being a face for my job applications, and can be made invisible all other times.

More than half the value is letting people reach out to you when you're not actively looking. Otherwise let them use your resume.

Re: New LinkedIn Data Leak Leaves 700M Users Exposed

#138
That doesn't look like a "leak", but more like the usual mass scraping of APIs.

An actual data leak from a breach would contain password hashes and private messages.

It means somehow, people can access that "leaked" data anyway, either with APIs or by paying LinkedIn

Re: New LinkedIn Data Leak Leaves 700M Users Exposed

#140

The biggest issue: you cannot not give them your personal data that they then loose. Let me contribute with an anecdote from yesterday (slightly off-topic but I promise to get around to it at the end). So just yesterday I needed to create a Microsoft account to try out Teams which is supposedly free. (I have avoided it so far, but my GF has been asked to use it for an interview and we wanted to do a tech test run bef…

The generous interpretation is that they need a way to give people something free while avoiding giving bots/spammers something free. You could point to CAPTCHA as a way to do this anonymously, but as far as I can tell, CAPTCHA has largely been broken by successful machine learning algos (most of the web scraping services I have seen offer "free CAPTCHA defeat" as a perk of buying their service).
Post reply on HN