Earlier quoted context omitted.
Unfortunately it seems to penalize people who choose to eat more fat vs. carbs.
No, since (as someone pointed out elsewhere in this thread), a gram of sugar has less than half of the calories in a gram of fat. If Alice and Berta both choose to consume exactly 2000 calories a day, but Alice chooses a low-fat diet while Berta chooses a low-carb one, then Berta will pay less according to that system. So it's not really a problem that sugar costs less; low-fat diet are still cheaper.
What Google's Famous Cafeterias Can Teach Us About Health
71–72 of 72 posts
Re: What Google's Famous Cafeterias Can Teach Us About Health
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm very very sympathetic to this view. I eat a high-fat diet, and have for over a year. But Google is probably right to act conservatively here. Don't blame Google for following the Harvard Pyramid, blame the Harvard Pyramid. They're the ones with the responsibility to update the status quo.
You should probably look at the Harvard Pyramid before making judgments based on Google's interpretation: http://www.personal.kent.edu/~cearley/ChemWrld/foodpyramid/H... They recommend eating lots of healthy fats such as olive, canola, and peanut oil. They also have refined carbohydrates in the "use sparingly" category.
Also, you may wish to dismiss me as crazy. I eat almost exclusively from the top left triangle. :)