Live data from Hacker News

One-Shot Free-View Neural Talking-Head Synthesis for Video Conferencing

nvidia-research-mingyuliu.com

1–10 of 52 posts

Re: One-Shot Free-View Neural Talking-Head Synthesis for Video Conferencing

#3
Wow, this works pretty well.

Makes me think of that chapter in Infinite Jest where videoconferencing gets popular, until people start using "optimized" computer-rendered images instead of showing their actual faces, at which point everyone goes back to audio-only.

Re: One-Shot Free-View Neural Talking-Head Synthesis for Video Conferencing

#5
post #3

Wow, this works pretty well. Makes me think of that chapter in Infinite Jest where videoconferencing gets popular, until people start using "optimized" computer-rendered images instead of showing their actual faces, at which point everyone goes back to audio-only.

I wouldn't mind video conferencing with computer generated avatars. I don't video conference to know what the other person looks like, and in fact knowing what they look like just creates lots of unnecessary bias. I do it for the cues from their gestures, facial expressions, the direction they are looking, etc. With a good tracking setup that works perfectly well today with digital avatars.

Re: One-Shot Free-View Neural Talking-Head Synthesis for Video Conferencing

#9

Surprisingly flexible algorithm. I threw a headshot illustration of a comic villain into it and it was able to successfully do all the rotations and even manipulate the eyes despite it not being photorealistic.

There was an app going around a few months ago called “wombo.ai” that will make a headshot sing. It had the same outcome when given non human pictures as a source. Easily killed an afternoon trying out different things.

Re: One-Shot Free-View Neural Talking-Head Synthesis for Video Conferencing

#10
While the client-side has input validation, it appears that the server-side does not, as I can edit the request body freely and it'll return accordingly.

It's interesting to see how the model fails at extreme values. I can see why they chose the cutoffs they did!

Post reply on HN