Live data from Hacker News

Privacy for Students: Surveillance Self-Defense

ssd.eff.org

11–20 of 95 posts

Re: Privacy for Students: Surveillance Self-Defense

#11
post #9

Why do people (schools) care? What's the goal here? How does tracking everything a student does help them and how can they justify wasting time and money on this?

Schools are tasked with trying to solve all manner of social problems. Kids didn't show up? Blame the school for not dragging them in. Kids cheat? The administrator has to deal with it. Kids are fat? Must be that the school isn't managing their lunches. This is what they have come up with.

Re: Privacy for Students: Surveillance Self-Defense

#13
post #5

Looks like I will be a parent in this mess! My own kids are done, but I have my granddaughter to raise. (Rough, but she is great and will probably make me live longer, so no worries.) This is going to be a fight! That level of surveillance is unacceptable. I have no plan yet, but will in a year or so. Guess it is wake up call time. Seriously, I look back at my upbringing and what I was able to do for my kids, and shu…

The best thing you can do, unfortunately, is teach them yourself. It is hard, but the real root of this problem is that people expect schools, and therefore the state, to not only teach their children math and history but raise them. As a result of this, people who actually want to raise their own kids get saddled with restrictive practices designed to raise your kids for you. The only way to opt out of it is to forego institutionalized education entirely, or at least if it hasn't gone quite that far yet, it will.

School the institution was not a very good place when I was there. It was not actually conducive to learning, peer influences were in general negative, authority figures were often abusive or at the very least ambivalent, and a sense of silent acquiescence to any authoritative demand was ingrained to the point that it takes young people years of their early adulthood to break this and begin building their own lives how they want them. Many of my peers went into massive debt on the presupposition that authority figures know what's best and that the institutional structure will look out for them, and I believe this is the direct result of the basically authoritarian environment they were raised in.

And this, all I had to deal with were grainy cameras in the halls and police writing children tickets. From what I hear from people younger than me, it is much worse now.

Re: Privacy for Students: Surveillance Self-Defense

#15

I feel like educators watched Ferris Bueller’s day off, and decided they would crush that spirit with totalitarian tactics. What’s the point of this level of control?

If you’re talking about teaching staff, they almost certainly have no part in purchasing or deploying these systems.

Re: Privacy for Students: Surveillance Self-Defense

#16
Spying on kids outrageous. The sad state of things is that the most valuable tool kids could learn now is that it's not strangers but authorities who are predatory and self interested, and you need to learn how to manage authorities and rules, which means, how do you extract value from them without being pulled in and subordinated to or hustled by them. Respect does not mean obedience, it means maintaining clear boundaries for something and recognizing what's safe and what isn't. Respect for authority today means treating it like fire or heavy machinery.

Raising kids being spied on is going to create a generation of spiritual fugitives and compromised, sadistic adult administrators. I could see home schooling being the next big tech platform trend, like a Montessori system with a way for parents to co-ordinate.

Re: Privacy for Students: Surveillance Self-Defense

#17
post #5

Looks like I will be a parent in this mess! My own kids are done, but I have my granddaughter to raise. (Rough, but she is great and will probably make me live longer, so no worries.) This is going to be a fight! That level of surveillance is unacceptable. I have no plan yet, but will in a year or so. Guess it is wake up call time. Seriously, I look back at my upbringing and what I was able to do for my kids, and shu…

I would consider this a teaching opportunity. Get her a Faraday case for the device. Explain to her that the case isn't to protect the device, but to protect her from the device. Try to make her control the device, rather than the other way around.

Re: Privacy for Students: Surveillance Self-Defense

#18

I feel like educators watched Ferris Bueller’s day off, and decided they would crush that spirit with totalitarian tactics. What’s the point of this level of control?

If you’re talking about teaching staff, they almost certainly have no part in purchasing or deploying these systems.

I am married to a teacher who works in a district with absurd, heavy-handed IT policies imposed with no nuance or regard for the needs of the teachers. Simply researching curriculum on the school network has become very difficult in the past few years. Places where teachers often post collections of links to lesson topics, Pinterest and others, have been made unreachable.

Re: Privacy for Students: Surveillance Self-Defense

#19
This sucks. My school district used a bunch of money to buy every student chromebooks. I remember just a few years ago, back when I was in middle school, I helped unbox all the chromebooks that were shipped to the school - about 2500 of them. Just for one middle school. Every student having access to these laptops made some thing a lot easier, like using Canvas to submit work done on Google Docs.

However, this is in fact a real problem. Our district forced very obtrusive monitoring and blocking software, as well as literal bloat to be installed on the chromebooks - there's like 20 browser extensions that cannot even be turned off, making the already low performing chromebooks so laggy that it's hard to use. Obvious "bad sites" like pirate bay, porn, and etc are understandably blocked, but they also block access to "social media" like reddit and discord.

This doesn't sound that bad yet. The problem comes when students use their own devices instead of the school provided ones. Some sites and services are still blocked at the internet level, but can by bypassed easily. This means that, students with own laptops could communicate with each other using services that chromebook students cannot access. This means that students from families with lower income or with more siblings literally get blocked out of friend groups, with access only to heavily monitored google chat. During distance learning, this problem has only been made worse.

Additionally, district chromebooks are absolutely no less distracting with the various censorship and monitoring and bloat - kids would still much rather browse the limited internet than pay much attention in class. I think there was some study that showed laptops drastically reduced student's academic performance on average. (Though I think access to computer is really powerful for learning how to access internet resources and developing actual knowledge.)

TLDR my opinion and experience on technology + kids

Re: Privacy for Students: Surveillance Self-Defense

#20
What makes this even scarier is the amount of technological incompetence the people have who are monitoring these things.

As far as I know, there’s no legal equivalent to HIPAA(which itself only scratches the surface of things) for ensuring the data and logs of these invasive systems stays under tight supervision. Now add in the fact that the people monitoring these systems may have an infinite amount of their own selfish agendas in mind for what to do with the information they gather… well, this will end poorly.

Post reply on HN