Mathematicians Explore Mirror Link Between Two Geometric Worlds
quantamagazine.org
Mathematicians Explore Mirror Link Between Two Geometric Worlds
1–10 of 22 posts
Re: Mathematicians Explore Mirror Link Between Two Geometric Worlds
#2Research fields like these has never convinced me of its valour really. I read the article as fan fiction.
Re: Mathematicians Explore Mirror Link Between Two Geometric Worlds
#3It most be nice to work with stuff that is in practice unfalsifiable paycheck after paycheck. Relieves stress! Research fields like these has never convinced me of its valour really. I read the article as fan fiction.
Pure mathematics relies on written proofs, not falsification by experimental evidence (though finding a counterexample is one powerful way to disprove a mathematical conjecture).
Re: Mathematicians Explore Mirror Link Between Two Geometric Worlds
#4It most be nice to work with stuff that is in practice unfalsifiable paycheck after paycheck. Relieves stress! Research fields like these has never convinced me of its valour really. I read the article as fan fiction.
Re: Mathematicians Explore Mirror Link Between Two Geometric Worlds
#5It most be nice to work with stuff that is in practice unfalsifiable paycheck after paycheck. Relieves stress! Research fields like these has never convinced me of its valour really. I read the article as fan fiction.
Re: Mathematicians Explore Mirror Link Between Two Geometric Worlds
#6The cutting edge discoveries in analysis at the end of the 19th century became the fundamentals of the subject taught to UK undergraduates within a 100 years. This kind of thing looks to me like it could revolutionize our understanding yet again.
Re: Mathematicians Explore Mirror Link Between Two Geometric Worlds
#7It most be nice to work with stuff that is in practice unfalsifiable paycheck after paycheck. Relieves stress! Research fields like these has never convinced me of its valour really. I read the article as fan fiction.
Research fields like algebraic geometry and symplectic geometry? Or pure mathematics in general? Pure mathematics relies on written proofs, not falsification by experimental evidence (though finding a counterexample is one powerful way to disprove a mathematical conjecture).
“You might have this small space that you can’t see or measure directly, but some aspects of the geometry of that space might influence real-world physics,” said Mark Gross, a mathematician at the University of Cambridge.
I mean modern research math can be silly, but it is (hopefully) not bogus.
Re: Mathematicians Explore Mirror Link Between Two Geometric Worlds
#8I remember many years ago an extremely bright and enthusiastic mathmo who was under the mistaken impression I was nearly as bright as he was explained some result in involving topology and mapping spaces. It got really quite involved and abstract and then he pulls a rabbit out of the hat and says "And this thing has the same order as the monster and no-one knows why." In the years that have followed we've just discov…
Re: Mathematicians Explore Mirror Link Between Two Geometric Worlds
#9I remember many years ago an extremely bright and enthusiastic mathmo who was under the mistaken impression I was nearly as bright as he was explained some result in involving topology and mapping spaces. It got really quite involved and abstract and then he pulls a rabbit out of the hat and says "And this thing has the same order as the monster and no-one knows why." In the years that have followed we've just discov…
All of it stems from the complexity of formal systems. It seems that all the hard problems in these various subjects are just different masks for the same fundamental hardnesses in properties of programs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Langlands_program
Moreover, it does not seem to me that, for example, the Clay Millennium problems are all glosses on the same underlying problem, so I'm a bit confused by your statement.