11–20 of 27 posts
Yes, absolutely. What would be the point, otherwise?
I believe I wanted Google+ to fix this problem for me, I was expecting a place where I could do my private life (with circles) and improve my professional life (public but without annoying some cirles of the private life).
In the end, I just feel lost not knowing how to use that pretty thing...
Separate websites for each social context makes my life easier. LinkedIn is professional. Facebook is social (well, before my contacts got mixed up). Dating websites are personal.
Google+ doesn't provide a strong visual indicator to help me switch contexts. I'm not absolutely certain that I haven't mixed up one of my business contacts with my personal ones. Add to that the chance that something gets sent out publicly by mistake and there is absolutely no chance I'll use G+ for anything beyond Twitter with pictures.
Always because some of the people on my circles don't really care for the things I say work-related. But then I thought I'm only showing my work-related stuff to a circle of coders and the whole world is missing it. I believe I wanted Google+ to fix this problem for me, I was expecting a place where I could do my private life (with circles) and improve my professional life (public but without annoying some cirles of…
google identity = work (buzz, profile, gmail, twitter) facebook identity = social
i think most people will continue to use existing social networks. we'll post appropriate content to our audience, and the audience at each network has a different tone. this is natural, i think.
Always because some of the people on my circles don't really care for the things I say work-related. But then I thought I'm only showing my work-related stuff to a circle of coders and the whole world is missing it. I believe I wanted Google+ to fix this problem for me, I was expecting a place where I could do my private life (with circles) and improve my professional life (public but without annoying some cirles of…
my answer to this in the past has been: google identity = work (buzz, profile, gmail, twitter) facebook identity = social i think most people will continue to use existing social networks. we'll post appropriate content to our audience, and the audience at each network has a different tone. this is natural, i think.
I have three personas: my professional, my personal and my social. Some people see more than one of my personas depending on context - if I'm out with a bunch of friends and run into a VC, I quickly switch into my professional persona. Separate websites for each social context makes my life easier. LinkedIn is professional. Facebook is social (well, before my contacts got mixed up). Dating websites are personal. Goog…
Always because some of the people on my circles don't really care for the things I say work-related. But then I thought I'm only showing my work-related stuff to a circle of coders and the whole world is missing it. I believe I wanted Google+ to fix this problem for me, I was expecting a place where I could do my private life (with circles) and improve my professional life (public but without annoying some cirles of…
Always because some of the people on my circles don't really care for the things I say work-related. But then I thought I'm only showing my work-related stuff to a circle of coders and the whole world is missing it. I believe I wanted Google+ to fix this problem for me, I was expecting a place where I could do my private life (with circles) and improve my professional life (public but without annoying some cirles of…
But they will pick it up soon, no doubt. The need is there, technical possibilities are endless, so submit your feedback as I did and wait.